Organisation “British Union of Fascists”

Reading time: 3 minutes

Following, is a short publication from the “Two Majors” Telegram channel.

Read also How the Anglo-Saxons Promoted Fascism in the 20th Century and Revived It in the 21st – Dmitry Medvedev and Our answer to NOT-A-Chamberlain, by Maria Zaharova. On Imperial British foundation of Nazism.

October 1, 1932. The “British Union of Fascists” (BUF) was founded in the United Kingdom under the leadership of Oswald Mosley – the largest fascist organisation in the interwar period on the islands. Inspired by Mussolini’s Italian fascism, Mosley quickly established connections with European dictators: he met with Hitler and received funding from Rome. BUF did not simply copy ideas – it adapted them to the British imperial spirit, promoting a corporate state, anti-communism, and anti-Semitism.

Influence on Europe before World War II was significant: BUF became part of a wave of fascist movements, showing that the “brown plague” could take root even in liberal democracies. The organisation popularised militarised marches, black shirts, and propaganda that echoed in Germany, Italy, and Spain. Although BUF never came to power (peaking at 50,000 members in 1934), it intensified the radicalisation of right-wing forces across the continent, contributing to societal polarisation before the war.

In fact, British fascists became a “bridge” between continental totalitarianism and the Anglo-Saxon world.

Today, the ideological heirs of BUF are far-right groups like Britain First, Patriotic Alternative, and the English Defence League (EDL), led by figures such as Tommy Robinson. They have evolved: from outright fascism to “patriotism” with an emphasis on anti-Islamism, nationalism, and anti-immigrant rhetoric. Post-war successors of Mosley, like the Union Movement, mutated into modern parties – from the British National Party (BNP) to Reform UK led by Nigel Farage, who uses Euroscepticism and “defence of British values.”

Against the backdrop of the migration crisis, this intensifies: in 2024-2025, the influx of migrants across the English Channel triggered mass riots. For obvious reasons, groups of enraged right-wing radicals organise protests at hotels, set buildings on fire, and mobilise crowds under slogans like “Britain for the British.”

In August 2025, members of the Homeland Party and similar groups coordinated actions across the country, using social media to incite counter hatred. Migrants in Britain are also quite the Nazis and radicals, just like here. Migration became a catalyst: 52% of Britons believe there are too many migrants (which is true), and the far-right exploits this to grow support, echoing Mosley’s propaganda.

The history of the 1930s is repeating. Neo-fascism is on the rise in Europe. Britain is no exception: migration chaos feeds radicals, while elites turn a blind eye, focusing on personal gain.

Overall, the EU is witnessing an open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, most imperialistic elements of financial capital, carried out by direct methods of internal terror.

The Nazi Roots of Today’s European Union

Reading time: 6 minutes

An article by Pål Steigan from October 21, 2025, translated by us from Norwegian.


Walther Funk, Minister of Economics and President of the Reichsbank, during the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials. Provided by: Robert Jackson.

There are clear similarities between today’s EU and Nazi Germany’s plans for a Greater Germanic Reorganisation of Europe. This may seem like a drastic claim, but if we read the Nazis’ own plans and compare them with how the EU works, and not least how the EU is developing, it is not difficult to see the similarities.

The most interesting document in this context is a speech given by Hitler’s Minister of Economics Walther Funk on April 25, 1940: “Die wirtschaftliche Neuordnung Europas”.

This was a key speech in which Funk, as German Minister of Economics, outlined Nazi Germany’s plans for an economic reorganisation of Europe under German domination, including the exploitation of resources from occupied countries such as Norway.

The document promotes the idea of ​​a “European economic community” dominated by Germany, with a focus on self-sufficiency, rational allocation of resources, and the elimination of “unnecessary” competition.

These are the key points of the document:
Continue reading

Facts about the Munich Conspiracy of September 30, 1938

Reading time: 9 minutes

The material is from Russian MFA Telegram channel, where one can also watch a short facta newsreel.

After a short fact-list from the Telegram post, we re-blog the in-depth version from the MFA’s Telegraph blog.


On September 30, 1938, the leaders of Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and France signed an agreement in Munich on the German annexation of the Sudetenland, an industrial region of Czechoslovakia where ethnic Germans made up 90 percent of the population. Czechoslovakia had not been invited to the talks; it was presented with the fact that its sovereign territory must be ceded to Nazi Germany as a fait accompli.

This disgraceful pact between the Western powers and Nazi Germany went down in history as the “Munich Conspiracy” or the “Munich Betrayal”.

FACTS:

▪️ Following the signing of the agreement between the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy in Munich, German troops crossed Czechoslovakia’s border on October 1 and occupied the entire area of the Sudetenland by October 10.

▪️ The Soviet Union was ready to defend Czechoslovakia, but the Soviet Army had to obtain permission to pass through Poland or Romania. Warsaw, which was interested in getting part of Czechoslovakia’s territory for itself, adamantly refused to support Prague against Germany and prohibited possible flights of Soviet aircraft to render aid to the Czechoslovak army. Romania made every effort to slow down the process as much as possible.

▪️ The Munich Betrayal crowned the Western powers’ policy of appeasing the aggressor. Hoping to avoid a conflict with the Third Reich, they tried to satisfy its growing territorial claims at the expense of Eastern and Central European countries.

▪️ As the world witnessed the collapse of the Versailles-Washington system of international relations that existed at the time, many countries began to cooperate with the Third Reich and fell into its sphere of influence.

▪️The Czechoslovakia crisis became a prologue to the bloodiest conflict in the history of humanity, demonstrating what underhanded plotting and reliance on countries’ selfish interests can lead to, i.e. paved the way to World War II.


The Munich Betrayal

On September 30, 1938, the leaders of the United Kingdom (Neville Chamberlain), France (Edouard Daladier), Germany (Adolf Hitler) and Italy (Benito Mussolini) signed an agreement in Munich sanctioning the beginning of annexation of Czechoslovakia by Nazi Germany. This crowned the appeasement policy which made a big war inevitable.

The Treaty of Versailles of June 28, 1919, ended the First World War and put Germany in a very difficult position. Pursuant to the document, Germany lost part of its traditional lands, its army was substantially reduced, and its defence industry was in effect eradicated. The document also contained a separate requirement on the demilitarisation of the Rhineland. The terms of the Versailles peace treaty were extremely harsh, which had a catastrophic effect on the German economy. The direct consequences included the total collapse of Germany’s industry, overwhelming impoverishment of the population and disastrous hyperinflation.
Continue reading

Finnish occupation of USSR during WWII in Soviet caricatures

Reading time: 7 minutes

To conclude (for now) the topic of Finland, let us look at a few caricatures and posters, depicting Finnish actions during its invasion of the USSR. We invite everyone to explore this post at our Telegram channel “Beorn And The Shieldmaiden” for a comprehensive set of links on the topic of Finland and also to see the list of the articles tagged with the “Finland” tag at the Beehive.

We had already presented the first image as an illustration to The new Finnish doctrine: Ignorance, deception, and ingratitude. An Article by Dmitry Medvedev:

Death to the German-Finnish Occupiers!
This is TASS Window #11 from Leningrad, created in July of 1944 by Vasily Selivanov.
The poster shows the Finns taking Hitler’s baits of the “Greater Finland to Urals and Leningrad”. It is accompanied by a verse by K. Vysokovsky.
— I’ll take the Urals! – the bandit cried,
Accepting Hitler’s bait at face value,
The Russian “Hurra!” was then heard,
Turning the bandits into dust and feathers!

Source: Beorn And The Shieldmaiden


An Awkward Camouflage

The caricature by Boris Yefimov from 1943 shows the dual nature of how Finland positioned itself during the WWII.

The sign above the bunny reads: «Finland is a quiet, HARMLESS country!». Meanwhile, the soldier behind the snow mound is loading a gun with an artillery shell, carrying an inscription «At Leningrad». Below the picture there is the second title: «Finnish bandits ‘under cover’»
Continue reading

Maria Zaharova’s replies to the Finnish President Stubb

Reading time: 6 minutes

Finnish President Alexander Stubb had the misfortune to show his complete lack of knowledge of history of his own country, and of the geopolitical realities and implications. The spokeswoman of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zaharova, was quick to grill Stubb on the matters of history. Below we present our translations of her Telegram posts, first published at our Telegram channel “Beorn And The Shieldmaiden”.

Read also: The Art of Timely Betrayal. Why the Finnish SS avoided punishment? and On Historical and International Legal Accountability of Finland for the Occupation of Karelia During Great Patriotic War (WWII) (1941–1944).

Mannerheim, the Executioner


Maria Zaharova comments on Stubb’s 1944 “solution” for 2025

At yesterday’s meeting in Washington, the President of Finland Stubb literally said the following:

“Finland has a long border with Russia and has its own experience of interaction with this country during World War II. We found a solution in 1944, and I am sure we will be able to find a solution in 2025”.

The big question is, did Stubb understand the full hell of his statement?

Let’s dive into history.

From 1939 to 1940 and from 1941 to 1944, Finland was in a state of armed conflict with the USSR.

As a result of Finnish provocations, the Soviet-Finnish war began, in which Helsinki lost. Then there was a short break, and then Finland openly sided with Hitler and declared war on the USSR three days after the start of Operation Barbarossa.

Finland’s allies of Hitler matched him. As the Finnish politician of that time, Väinö Voionmaa wrote: “We are a state of the ‘Axis’ [Rome-Berlin-Tokyo], and also mobilised for attack”.

Finland committed real war crimes, which it itself admitted in 1946 following the trial of Finnish war criminals.

It was the Finns who played an important supporting role for the German Army Group North during the Siege of Leningrad – a genocide of the Soviet people. The President of Finland Ryti wrote to the German envoy: “Leningrad must be eliminated as a major city”.

From hunger, cold, bombings, and artillery shelling in besieged Leningrad, at least 1,093,842 people died, according to some estimates up to 1.5 million people. And these figures are continuously refined by historians and researchers – always increasing due to newly uncovered facts.
Continue reading

On Historical and International Legal Accountability of Finland for the Occupation of Karelia During Great Patriotic War (WWII) (1941–1944)

Reading time: 33 minutes

Below is a complete copy of the report by the Representative office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in Petrozavodsk, published at the site of the Russian Foreign Ministry on July 7, 2025. The report can also be downloaded as a PDF file. A summary of the report is available at the MFA’s Telegram channel.


On Historical and International Legal Accountability of Finland for the Occupation of Karelia During Great Patriotic War (WWII) (1941–1944)

Report by the Representative office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in Petrozavodsk

GENERAL INFORMATION

September 30, 2024, marked 80 years since the liberation of Karelia from Nazi and Finnish occupation forces. Given the need to reaffirm the historical truth, it is again relevant to direct the attention of the world community to the crimes committed by Finland during its occupation of Karelia from 1941 to 1944. While these atrocities were adjudicated by a Finnish court under the agreement between the USSR and Finland, the proceedings demonstrated excessive leniency towards the accused.

On August 1, 2024, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia ruled on the application of the Prosecutor of the Republic of Karelia to establish a fact of legal significance. The Court recognised crimes committed by Nazi occupation forces and Finnish occupation authorities and troops on the territory of the Karelo-Finnish SSR during the Great Patriotic War (WWII) (1941-1944) as war crimes and crimes against humanity. These crimes, defined in the Charter of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (August 8, 1945) and affirmed by UN General Assembly Resolutions 3(I) (February 13, 1946) and 95 (I) (December 11, 1946), were perpetrated against at least 86,000 Soviet citizens. The victims comprised civilians and prisoners of war serving in the Red Army (the armed forces of the USSR). Furthermore, the Court recognised these acts as genocide against national, ethnic, and racial groups representing the population of the USSR – the peoples of the Soviet Union. This genocide formed part of a plan by Nazi Germany and its ally, Finland, to expel and exterminate the entire local population of the occupied Soviet territories to colonise the land.

The evidence presented to the court confirmed that the occupiers systematically tortured civilians and prisoners of war. This included subjecting them to forced labour under brutal conditions, physical beatings, the prolonged denial of medical care, and confinement in inhumane concentration camp conditions. Collective punishment was routinely applied to civilians and prisoners of war for even minor acts of disobedience. Based on evidence presented during hearings, the court established that over 26,000 civilians and prisoners of war perished during the occupation. These deaths resulted from execution, torture, starvation, and disease. Furthermore, the occupiers deliberately destroyed cities, villages, and industrial and agricultural infrastructure. The total economic and infrastructural damage inflicted upon the region, adjusted for inflation to current rouble values, exceeds 20 trillion roubles[1].

Considering the ruling of the Supreme Court, this report provides a legal assessment of Finland’s conduct during World War II. The documented violations include violations of international treaties, crimes against peace, the implementation of a brutal policy in the occupied territories, which entailed war crimes and crimes against humanity, including genocide, ethnic segregation, cruel treatment of non-Finno-Ugric population and prisoners of war.
Continue reading

Finnish Face of Fascism, an RT Documentary

Reading time: < 1 minute

During World War II, Finland became Germany’s strategic ally on the Eastern Front and fought against the Soviet Union. From 1941 to 1944 the Finnish army controlled Karelia, one of the republics of the Soviet Union. Nazi ideas thrived among the Finnish leadership, who developed a theory of racial superiority. According to this theory the Karelia population has been divided into two parts: the privileged Karelians and Finnis, and the Russians. Ethnic Russians were doomed to starvation and working to death. Though almost 80 years have passed since Finnish concentration camp survivors were liberated, the perpetrators of these crimes still go unpunished.


Backup at Rumble.

Finland’s Dirty Secret: From “Neutral” Ally to Hitler’s Partner – Dispelling the Finnish Myths

Reading time: 20 minutes

We translated this very informative series of posts from a German Telegram channel FKT – Geschichte der Sowjetunion (History of the Soviet Union) and published it on our Telegram channel Beorn And The Shieldmaiden. Here we present the series in the form of one consecutive article.

👉 Read also: The new Finnish doctrine: Ignorance, deception, and ingratitude. An Article by Dmitry Medvedev, “Kill the Russians.” 105 years ago, the Finnish army staged the massacre in Vyborg. The truth must come out!, and many other materials at the blog, bearing the Finland tag.


Finland’s Dirty Secret: From “Neutral” Ally to Hitler’s Partner

Today, Finland likes to play the victim card and acts as if it had nothing to do with the siege of Leningrad. The argument goes:

“We did not attack the city, Mannerheim refused to bomb it, we just stood by and took care of our own affairs.”

A nice story. Too bad it’s pure fiction.

The reality is different: Finnish troops sat for three years at the gates of Leningrad. They did not drink coffee and were not “neutral.” They held a third of the blockade line. Without Finland’s involvement, the Germans would not have been able to completely seal off the city. Together they closed the ring that starved one million people, including 400,000 children.

And Mannerheim, the “savior”?

His order was to bomb the Road of Life (which was actually not a road but a frozen lake), the only route over which food was transported across Lake Ladoga.

On June 25, 1941, Mannerheim ordered the Finnish army to commence hostilities against the USSR:

“I call you to a holy war against the enemy of our nation. Together with the mighty forces of Germany, as brothers in arms, we resolutely embark on a crusade against the enemy to secure a safe future for Finland.”

Finland dreamed of expansion and had concrete plans. On the dream map of “Greater Finland,” Russian cities like Murmansk, Leningrad, and Kandalaksha are marked as Finnish.

Let’s Get to Know Mannerheim

Before we come to Finland’s well-known war against the USSR on Hitler’s side, we need to turn back the clock a bit and look at the context. Finland as a state emerged within Russia. Before the Russo-Swedish War, these territories were simply the eastern part of Sweden. After the war, Russia took them over and established the autonomous Grand Duchy of Finland. It remained part of the Russian Empire until the 1917 revolution.

Now let’s get to know Mannerheim – a military and political figure who came from poor Swedish-Finnish noble backgrounds but rose to become a general in the Russian army and an officer of the Imperial Guard, close to Nicholas II himself and part of the empire’s military elite. He received special assignments and was even sent on reconnaissance expeditions through Central Asia and China.

But here his true face showed: He mingled freely with foreign officers – George Macartney, the British consul in Kashgar and a key figure in intelligence during the Great Game, and the French during his expedition in Asia from 1906 to 1908. Later, he was even suspected of having connections to Masonic circles. All this suggests that his loyalty was never fully aligned with Russia.

After the empire’s collapse, he wasted no time. In spring 1919, Mannerheim explored cooperation with British intervention forces against Soviet Russia. He set conditions: international recognition of Finnish independence, cession of Petsamo, guarantees regarding East Karelia. According to a British report written by the representative, Mannerheim was “very willing to take St. Petersburg and destroy the Bolsheviks there” in February 1919.

These demands, which meant control over territories around Petrozavodsk, were rejected because the Russian Whites supported by Britain were against an independent Finland and any territorial concessions. Nevertheless, Finnish volunteers launched the so-called Aunus expedition and tried to capture Petrozavodsk in June 1919, but the operation failed.

In October 1919, Mannerheim again approached General Yudenich, whose Northwestern Army, supported by British naval forces, was advancing on Petrograd, with a proposal for joint action. His terms were rejected again. Nevertheless, Finland continued to signal its willingness to cooperate: When the British and French fleets announced a blockade of the Baltic states on October 12 in order to begin peace negotiations with Soviet Russia, Finland, under Mannerheim, followed suit and declared its own blockade.

Finland’s Relations with Hitler in the 1930s

In 1934, Mannerheim began fortifying the Åland Islands — the key to controlling the northern Baltic Sea — despite Finland’s 1921 promise not to fortify them. In 1935, he approached Germany and participated in a secret conference with Hermann Göring, Hungarian Prime Minister Gömbös, and the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Polish Parliament to discuss joint measures against the USSR. Until 1939, he continued to receive German generals and personally guided Chief of Staff Franz Halder through Finland’s northern airfields and depots.
Continue reading

The new Finnish doctrine: Ignorance, deception, and ingratitude. An Article by Dmitry Medvedev

Reading time: 19 minutes

The following article war written by Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, and published by TASS.

UPDATE 15.09.2025: Russian MFA issued an official translation of the article on their Telegraph blog on September 13. We are updating this blog with the official text, making it a re-blog. All illustrations are ours.

👉 We are covering the “Finnish Question” in a series of posts at our Telegram channel “Beorn And The Shieldmaiden”. The series “Finland’s Dirty Secret: From “Neutral” Ally to Hitler’s Partner” will be published at the Beehive later, upon its conclusion. Read the two publications by Maria Zaharova, in response to the Finnish PM Stubb’s ignoramous statements: part 1 and part 2.

👉 See also The Art of Timely Betrayal. Why the Finnish SS avoided punishment? and The European Genocide of the Russian People.

The new Finnish doctrine: Ignorance, deception, and ingratitude

Deputy Chairman of Security Council Dmitry Medvedev draws historical parallels between today’s Finnish leaders and their predecessors of nearly a century ago, and brings up the consequences of their past aggression against Russia.

Last week, I visited the Russian-Finnish border in the Leningrad Region and spoke with local authorities and our border guards. The border, once bustling, is now deserted. By Helsinki’s decision, decades of constructive and mutually beneficial relations have been ruined. Ordinary Finns are the first to feel the consequences. They had gained much from thriving trade and economic cooperation, and now they openly voice frustration with the misguided policies of their own government, which clearly go against their interests.

I would like to say a few words about the underlying causes of this situation. It is by no means accidental. Today’s turbulent geopolitics has brought to light the long-standing issues and revealed their true nature. This is what happened to Finland.

A visit to our northwestern regions in early autumn inevitably brings to mind one of the most tragic dates in the history of St Petersburg, which is the onset of the siege on September 8, 1941. Yet, it seems that we are the only ones to remember those dark days. The direct perpetrators of those events are making every effort to erase the traces of their crimes from historical memory, or at least to avoid “inconvenient” parallels with their current policies. And this concerns not only Germany, which at the official level refuses to recognise the siege of Leningrad as a crime against humanity.

Death to the German-Finnish Occupiers!
This is TASS Window #11 from Leningrad, created in July of 1944 by Vasily Selivanov.
The poster shows the Finns taking Hitler’s baits of the “Greater Finland to Urals and Leningrad”. It is accompanied by a verse by K. Vysokovsky.
— I’ll take the Urals! – the bandit cried,
Accepting Hitler’s bait at face value,
The Russian “Hurra!” was then heard,
Turning the bandits into dust and feathers!

Source: Beorn And The Shieldmaiden

We should not forget that it would have been impossible to impose the siege of Leningrad, a siege that took hundreds of thousands of civilian lives, without the involvement of the Finnish armed forces. Succumbing to revenge-seeking moods and striving to revise the outcomes of the 1939-1940 Soviet-Finnish standoff, the Finnish leadership recklessly plunged into the furnace of war alongside Nazi Germany. At that time, ultra-nationalist propaganda narratives prevailed in Finnish society. With the approval of their Nazi brethren, Helsinki seriously discussed the idea of Finnlands Lebensraum (Finland’s Living Space). The country’s military-political authorities intended to reclaim territories ceded to the Soviet Union under the Moscow Peace Treaty of March 12, 1940 and to reach “natural borders of Greater Finland” from the Gulf of Finland to the Barents Sea, including East Karelia, Leningrad and its environs, and the Kola Peninsula freeing these lands from the hated Russians. In their wildest fantasies, the Finns wanted to advance beyond the Ural Mountains all the way to the Ob River. Back in the day, these territorial claims (in proportion to the country’s actual size) were among the greediest in Europe. They even surpassed territorial claims to neighbouring states voiced by other Axis countries, including Italy, Romania, and Hungary.
Continue reading

“Gretchen” as a driving force and a personification of Nazi plundering, both then and now

Reading time: 10 minutes

In 2022, with the start of the SMO, the Ukrainian forces that moved into Donbass were on many occasions seen plundering homes of the residents they were supposedly protecting. The Ukrainian postal office was overworked with the parcels being sent from Donbass to the Western Ukraine, containing plundered goods. During the Ukrainian occupation of the small portion of Kursk region, a similar scenario unfolded, with plundered goods and abducted people being sent to the Ukraine.

That is nothing new, as the German Nazi occupiers were doing wholesale plundering of the Soviet land at all levels – taking away both material goods and people.

Presenting an extended article from the publication at our Telegram channel “Beorn And The Shieldmaiden”.

On Friday, November 13, 1942, in issue №267 of the newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda (Red Star), Ilya Ehrenburg published an article simply called “Gretchen”, telling about the driving force and the psyche of such plundering.

The original print of Ilya Ehrenburg’s «Gretchen» in Красная Звезда. Source

⭐️ Red Star is the newspaper of the armed forces of the USSR and now, Russia. During the Great Patriotic War, it reached the soldiers at the fronts with the field post, thus binding together the whole fighting Soviet Union and contributing to building a united spiritual front.

Ilya Ehrenburg as well as many other gifted Soviet writers such as Konstantin Simonov, Mihail Sholohov, Aleksey Tolstoy, Andrey Platonov, Iosif Grossman worked as war correspondents embedded with the troops at the fronts.

After the war, the most significant of Ehrenburg’s articles and pieces were published in the book Война (War). It was translated to many languages and published under different titles.

«War» contains shocking testimony of atrocities committed by the fascists in the USSR and of the strength and endurance of the Soviet peoples. It is a warning to the future; a soul-wrecking imperative to all anti-fascists!

«Gretchen will no longer receive parcels»
The 1943 drawing by Yulij Ganf may have been inspired by the article «Gretchen».
This poster is one of many on the display at the digital exhibition of the Nekrasov library, “The Artists of Victory”

Gretchen

I’ve seen a lot of Fritz’ wallets. In one section there are naked girls and addresses of brothels, in the other (Fritz is careful, he will not confuse) there is a photo of a blonde German woman with round porcelain eyes. This is Fritz’s wife, Frau Muller or Frau Schmidt. Sometimes Fritz has a bride instead of a wife. This bride may have half a dozen children, but since Fritz did not marry her, he calls her “the bride.”
Continue reading

The atrocities of the Romanians shocked even the Germans: what was the Nazi occupation of Moldavia like

Reading time: 7 minutes

Continuing the topic of Romania and Moldavia, we present a translation of an article by Maxim Kemerrer, which was published in RuBaltic on July 17, 2022.


The atrocities of the Romanians shocked even the Germans: what was the Nazi occupation of Moldavia like

81 years have passed since the entry of Romanian troops into the capital of the Moldavian SSR, Chisinau. Today’s leaders in Chisinau and Bucharest call the events of the initial stage of the Great Patriotic War for another reunification of Romania and Moldavia. In fact, it was another occupation of Moldavia by Romania, which resulted in the terror of the civilian population and the destruction of the peoples of the multinational Moldavian SSR by the Romanian occupiers.

The state of Romania arose largely due to the support of Britain and France, who sought to create their own vassal near the southern borders of the Russian Empire, which could be used against Russia. (BATS note: yet, as we saw from the publication How Russia created Romania, it was done at the expense of Russia, and with Russian arms.) From the very beginning of its existence, Romania began to fulfil precisely this task, making territorial claims to Bessarabia.

However, it never wanted to go to war with Russia, and therefore, at that time, limited itself to cultural and ideological expansion, declaring that one people lived on the two banks of the Prut.

At the same time, the fact that the population of Bessarabia has always been multinational, with a certain dominance of Moldavians, was completely ignored.

Besides them, Malorossians lived compactly in the north and east of this territory, a significant part of the south of Bessarabia was compactly populated by Gagauz and Bulgarians, and the introduction of the pale of settlement in the Russian Empire led to a large number of Jews coming to Bessarabia. Thus, according to the census results of the late 19th century, Jews made up up to a third of the population of Chisinau, and many county centers of the country were simply large Jewish townships.

Romania’s desire to seise Bessarabia came true only in 1918, when the Moldavian People’s Republic was established after the Great October Socialist Revolution. On December 7, 1917, under the pretext of purchasing food, two regiments of the Romanian army crossed the Prut River, occupied Leovo and several border villages. Soon, on March 27, 1918, the parliament, called the Sfatul Tserii (Council of the Country), surrounded by Romanian soldiers with machine guns, voted for the “annexation” of Bessarabia to Romania; representatives of the Romanian military command were also present in the voting hall. After that, the parliament was dispersed by the Romanian military.


A commentary

A commentary from Moldavian parliament deputy from Beltsy, Alexander Nesterovsky, published in Bloknot Moldova. The commentary was made in 2018 with regard to the initiative from the Moladvian “Party of National Unity” to organise the so-caleld “Day of unity” in Beltsy:

“In the very first days after the Romanian troops entered the territory of the Moldavian Democratic Republic, the punishers shot 45 peasant delegates of the 3rd Bessarabian Provincial Peasant Congress, held in Chisinau. Then 58 members of the Sfatul Tserii, who opposed the annexation of Bessarabia to Romania, were arrested. Some of them were shot. Their place in the hall was taken by supporters of the Romanian authorities. The decision of Sfatul Tserii to join Romania on April 9, 1918, was made at gunpoint, but even after that, almost half of the delegates – 47% – voted against joining.”


As a result, Bessarabia was under Romanian occupation until June 28, 1940; throughout this period, the territory between the Dniester and the Prut remained in fact in the status of a colony and was the region of Romania with the lowest standard of living.

During the 22 years of the Romanian occupation, Bessarabia took the first place in Europe in terms of population mortality, over 500,000 people left it, tens of thousands of local residents who opposed the occupation were shot, and about 200,000 died of starvation.

The Romanian occupation ended in 1940, when Soviet troops occupied Bessarabia. By this time, the Moldavian Autonomous Republic (MASSR) had already existed in the USSR for 16 years, established on the lands of the Ukrainian SSR and the Left Bank of the Dniester (modern Transnistria).

Unfortunately, the period after the liberation of Bessarabia was short — less than a year later, on June 22, 1941, the Great Patriotic War began, in which Romania became an ally of Hitler, and on July 16, Romanian occupation forces again entered the territory of Bessarabia.
Continue reading

«17 Moments of Spring» (1973) – Fragment about the future of the Third Reich

Reading time: 3 minutes

In this fragment from episode 11 of the legendary Soviet film, «17 Moments of Spring», the truth is heard through the mouth of the brilliant Soviet actor Leonid Bronevoy, playing Gestapo chief, SS Gruppenfuhrer Heinrich Müller, in his monologue addressed to Stirlitz, played by Vyacheslav Tihonov.


Backup at Rumble.

👉 The complete series with English and Spanish subtitles can be watched at this YouTube palylist.

«17 Moments of Spring» is a novel by Julian Semyonov, the plot of which is based on the real events of the Second World War, when German representatives tried to negotiate a separate peace (BATS note: see our earlier publication The SVR has published new declassified documents on the Nazis’ ties with the West in 1945) with representatives of Western intelligence services (the so-called “Operation Sunrise”) in the spring of 1945. The novel was first published in the “Moscow” magazine in issues 11-12, 1969.

Prior books about the Soviet intelligence officer turned out to be so successful that even the chairman of the KGB, Yuri Andropov, liked them, and personally contacted Semyonov praising his work. The gratitude turned out to be not only verbal: Andropov gave the writer permission to visit the KGB archives, and also initiated the film adaptation of the novels.

The events described in the novel are based on the memoirs of Brigadefuhrer Walter Schellenberg. This man held the position of chief of intelligence of the Third Reich. According to the verdict of the Nuremberg trials, he received a rather short sentence, given his position. He later wrote a memoir, which was published in Europe after Schellenberg’s death. The book ended up in the Soviet Union and was kept in a closed KGB archive until Semyonov managed to read it. So the writer had a ready-made plot with real characters in his hands, which only needed to be finalised and add the sharpness of a political detective story.

Julian Semyonov did a tremendous job writing the book. In addition to working for hours with archives, he personally interviewed several SS leaders — among them, Paul Blum, an employee of the Bern residency of A. Dulles — and representatives of the Third Reich as a correspondent, and also participated in the search for Hitler’s henchmen.

In 1973, a 12-episode film adaptation of the novel directed by Tatiana Lioznova premiered.
Continue reading

Genocide: Justice Will Prevail – RT Documentary. Thoughts by Zotov on “Generalplan Ost”

Reading time: 5 minutes

The Third Reich war against USSR was never just about territory or resources.


Video at Rumble.

It was a campaign to clear ‘living space’. Under the Hunger Plan, grain would be stripped from southern Soviet lands, condemning 30 million people to starvation.

Mass killings of civilians was a part of Nazi strategy. Under the guise of ‘anti-partisan operations’, the Nazis wiped entire villages off the map across Soviet lands. They set up brutal death camps for POWs. Over 380,000 people were murdered in Rostov Region, while in Pskov Region, more than 600,000 civilians were exterminated.

One of the most horrifying episodes in this genocide was the siege of Leningrad. For 872 days, citizens endured unimaginable hunger, cold, and suffering. Recent estimates place the death toll at over 1,093,000 people.

Our film brings together historians, search teams, prosecutors, and forensic experts to reveal the scale of Nazi atrocities across the country: mass executions at a brick factory in Salsk, the murder of 54 children in a sanatorium in Teberda… These are just a few chapters in one vast, systematic crime called ‘genocide’.

The word ‘genocide’ didn’t even enter international law until 1948, after the main Nuremberg trials had already ended. At Nuremberg, Nazi crimes against civilians were recognised as crimes against humanity, and the guilt of the accused was firmly established.

But today, 80 years later, there are efforts in the West to rewrite that history and deny the scale of suffering inflicted on the Soviet people. That’s why it’s become necessary to formally and legally establish the full extent of Nazi crimes.

Over the past 5 years, Russian courts have reviewed archival records, examined new evidence, conducted modern forensic investigations, and gathered testimony from witnesses. Based on the total body of evidence, the courts have concluded: the Nazis’ actions constituted genocide.

🎦 Watch the new film by Vitaly (https://rtdoc.tv/author/70-vitaly-buzuev) Buzuev and Ekaterina (https://en.rtdoc.tv/author/205-ekaterina-kitaitseva) Kitaytseva ‘Genocide: Justice Will Prevail’.

Source: MTdocumentary

‼️ Read also our newly-translated article The European Genocide of the Russian People


Following is a Telegram post by Georgy Zotov, translated by “Siberian Matrëshka”:

Once upon a time, Germany developed a master plan called “Ost” (“East”)

It was initiated in 1940 by Reichsfuehrer SS Heinrich Himmler. At first, Jews and Poles were taken into account, but after June 22, 1941, the main focus became the fate of the Soviet Union and the Slavic nationalities inhabiting it.
Continue reading

The European Genocide of the Russian People

Reading time: 51 minutes

Preamble

April 19th – Day of Remembrance of the Genocide of the Soviet People. The crimes committed by the Nazi occupiers and their accomplices against the civilian population of besieged Leningrad were recognised in 2022 as “a war crime, a crime against humanity and genocide of national and ethnic groups that represented the population of the USSR, the peoples of the Soviet Union.”
This decision was made by the St. Petersburg City Court.

The northern capital was under blockade from September 8th 1941 to January 27th 1944. As a result of the analysis of archival documents, it was established that during the blockade, at least 1 million 93 thousand residents of the city died – more than a third of the population at the beginning of 1941 – and not 649 thousand, as was determined in Soviet times.

In addition, it was proven in court that representatives of 11 countries took part in the siege of Leningrad. Besides to the Germans, these are citizens of Finland, Belgium (Volunteer Legion “Flanders”), Spain (“Blue Division”), the Netherlands (Volunteer Legion “Netherlands”) and Norway (Norwegian Legion), as well as individual volunteers from among Austrians, Latvians, Poles, French and Czechs. The trial in St. Petersburg became the ninth trial in Russia to recognise the crimes of the Nazis and their accomplices committed in the country during the Great Patriotic War as genocide.

Previously, similar hearings were held in the Novgorod, Pskov, Rostov, Bryansk, Oryol regions, Krasnodar region, Crimea, and Leningrad region.

As the leading Russian researcher of the history of the Leningrad blockade, Doctor of Historical Sciences Nikita Lomagin, said, in addition to the fact that the court decision gives a precise legal definition of the events of the hard times of war, it “also has important international significance, being a reminder to the current generation of European politicians about the crimes committed by Nazi Germany and its accomplices during the war.”

“Europe in a United Front against Moscow”
Such was the title in the German Nazi mouthpiece “Völkische Beobachter” from June 23, 1941. Does this sound familiar?
The headline was followed by a secondary heading:
“The countries of the continent acknowledge Germany’s historic mission”.
After the ingress, the article starts with the mention of a publication in the Spanish Madrid-based newspaper “Informaciones” — “Europe united and aligned against the Soviet Union”.


Introduction

You are about to read a translation of an extensive article that tells in unadorned detail what The Third Reich was doing to the population of the Soviet Union, and what they were yet planning to do, had they not been stopped by the Soviet Union. World War II was indeed The Great Patriotic War for the survival of own kind, fought against all of the “united collective West”. Additional materials were included from the TopWar article “Hitler’s Palace in Ukraine”.

Those Ukrainians (and Bulgarians) who think that Hitler had as his intention to “liberate” Ukraine (as the brainwashing in Ukraine goes these days), they should read the article “The text of Hitler’s statement on the extermination of Slavic peoples has been published in Russia for the first time”.

One first-hand testimonial of how the German Nazi plan affected the Soviet population can be read in the article The Great Patriotic War in Ukraine. A historical retrospective by Rostislav Ischenko


The European Genocide of the Russian People

14.12.2020, by Konstantin Odessit

Main Cathedral of the Russian Armed Forces

One remark first: by the Russian people I mean the Eastern Slavs, with the exception of the Galician Uniates (whose dialect and world-view are closer to that of Poles, a Western one).

The year of the 75th anniversary of the Great Victory is coming to an end. Looking at modern supporters of Hitler among the Russian/Ukrainian Nazis and the liberoids, like “Kolya from Urengoy” (BATS note: see the open letter by Andrey Medvedev in Commemorating the 9th of May – No One’s Forgotten, Nothing’s Forgotten! with a strong response to that boy Kolya) apologising for the “cruel treatment” of German prisoners of war (who were forced to work), the question arises: “Who are they?”

Are they idiots without roots, who renounced the memory of their Russian ancestors (who for more than a thousand years considered themselves Rus, Rusichs, Rusyns, Little Russians (Malorossy), Great Russians (Velikorossy), Belorussians, that is, the Russian people) and trying to join the Western “superhumans” in a lackadaisical way (“let us, the stupid ones, into Europe, rule over us!”), or are they not aware of Hitler’s plans for a “final solution” not only to the Jewish, but also to the Russian (Slavic) question, did they not listen to the Nazi project of “living space in the East for the higher race.”

A race, to which the “true Aryans” did not even remotely relate any of the Slavs.

And because of this kind of not-entirely-Russians/lost-Russians or “Ivans and Abrams, who don’t remember their kinship”, the history of the Second World War is for us by no means “the affairs of bygone days”. Moreover, since 2014, Ukraine has been occupied by modern Nazis, who continue the policy of “cleansing the living space” of Slavs and forced de-Russification.

The organisers of Euromaidan continue Hitler’s policy of genocide: the pace of the Maidan’s “de-population” of Ukraine does not differ much from the rate of extermination of the inhabitants of Ukraine in the early forties of the last century: then and now they amount to about 2 – 2.5 million civilian deaths per year. The modern Maidanomor of Ukrainians/Russians is a true genocide (like other real Western genocides of the past in Ireland, North America, India, Australia…), unlike the fake “Golodomor of Ukrainians” of the 30s of the last century. Moreover, this is a direct demonic link – Hitler planned a “cleansing” of Eastern Europe for the benefit of the “superhuman” using the example of “cleansing” of North America, and the Maidanists, following Hitler, are “cleansing” Ukraine.

But is it only following Hitler? He simply united the continental Europe, which zealously engaged in the genocide of Russians under his leadership, first of all, the inhabitants of Ukraine, whom the past Nazis did not separate from the Russians.

The Finnish poster “Road to Freedom” from the 22nd of June 1941, depicting the whole future EU baring its teeth on the USSR.

One of the main “prizes” of the European “drang nah Osten” in 1941 was the blessed Ukraine.

During the war, Hitler travelled across almost all of it: he visited Poltava, Uman, Mariupol, Zaporozhye, Zhytomyr, Berdichev. Here are his impressions:

“We are struggling to claim several meters of land from the sea, we are suffering, mastering the swamps, whereas in Ukraine the land is infinitely fertile. And this land is waiting for us. Ukraine can give us what Germany lacks. This task must be completed despite the losses.”

The Fuhrer noted that for the Germans, the Ukrainian lands are like India for the British, and one can manage it with the help of only a handful of people at first, and then colonise the eastern territories by the Germans, primarily Ukraine.


Generalplan Ost, a historical remark

“Generalplan Ost” (General Plan for the East) was a secret Nazi plan developed to implement their racial ideology in Eastern Europe. The plan involved the mass displacement, enslavement, and extermination of most Slavic peoples to make way for the “expansion of living space” (Lebensraum) for the German people. The primary goal was to create a new order based on the complete dominance of the “Aryan race.”

The plan included the following actions:

  1. Extermination and Displacement: It was anticipated that up to 50 million Slavs would either be exterminated or displaced to the East. This primarily concerned Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and other peoples.
  2. Germanisation: German settlers were to colonise the “cleansed” territories, especially in Poland and the western regions of the Soviet Union. This was planned to include both German citizens and ethnic Germans from other countries.
  3. Slave Labour: The surviving Slavs were to be turned into slaves and used for labour to benefit the Third Reich.
  4. Systematic Destruction of the Intelligentsia: From the beginning of the war, the Nazis started the extermination of the intelligentsia and cultural elite among the Slavic peoples to prevent any resistance.
  5. Changing the Demographic Structure: The plan envisaged changing the demographic structure of the occupied territories by exterminating most of the local population and replacing it with German settlers.

“Generalplan Ost” was never fully implemented due to the course of the war, but its elements were reflected in Nazi policies towards the occupied territories, including mass murders, deportations, the creation of ghettos and concentration camps, and forced labour. These actions led to immense human losses and suffering.


According to the “Generalplan Ost”, almost all Poles, 75% of Belarusians and 65% of Ukrainians, including residents of Galicia, were supposed to be resettled in Western Siberia. The higher proportion of Ukrainians left behind was due to the fact that the higher race then (without modern mechanisation) needed a lot of agricultural workers. And in general, according to the plans of 1940-1941, over 30 million local Slavic population were to be deported or exterminated from the European part of the Union. In April 1942, in the revised plan, this number increased to 50 million people.

Exactly one month after the start of the war with the USSR, on the evening of July 22, 1941, at the Werewolf headquarters, Reichsleiter Martin Bormann began to share his impressions of the trip to the Ukrainian villages:

I have not seen a single person with glasses, many of them have great teeth, they are well-fed and, obviously, maintain good health until old age.
Under the influence of the extraordinarily difficult conditions in which these people lived for many centuries, a natural and very careful selection took place.
Any of us, after drinking a glass of raw water, will immediately get sick.
And these people live in mud, among sewage, drink some kind of terrible water from their wells and rivers and do not get sick

The growth of the number of these Russians – or the so-called Ukrainians – in the not too distant future will pose a threat to us.
We are interested in ensuring that these Russians – or so-called Ukrainians – do not multiply too much: after all, we intend to ensure that one day all these lands that were previously considered Russian will be completely inhabited by Germans

Water only for the German soldiers. Russians taking water from here will be shot. Water for the Russians is on the other side.

Hitler noted in this regard:

It will only benefit us if their girls and women use contraceptives as much as possible. It is necessary not only to allow unlimited trade in them, but also to encourage it in every possible way, because we are not in the least interested in the growth of the local population…

As for the hygiene of the conquered population, we are not at all interested in spreading our knowledge among them and thereby creating a completely undesirable base for a colossal increase in population.

Therefore, it is necessary to prohibit any hygienic actions in these territories… There can be no question of vaccinating local residents and similar measures to improve their health. And to do everything possible to spread among them the superstitious idea that all these vaccinations and similar things are extremely dangerous…

Hitler repeatedly emphasised that Russians, including Ukrainians, would have to work for the Germans and everything should be done to ensure that these people were at the lowest possible level of cultural development.

Village communities need to be organised in such a way that nothing akin to a union would ever form between the neighbouring communities. In any case, the creation of unified churches on more or less extensive Russian lands should be avoided. It is in our interests that each village has its own sect with its own ideas about God. Even if in this way the inhabitants of individual villages become, like Negroes or Indians, adherents of magical cult, we can only welcome this, because thereby the dividing trends in the Russian space will become even more intense…

In no case should the local population be granted the right to receive higher education. If we make this mistake, we will raise those who will fight against our government.

Let them have schools, and if they want to go to them, then let them pay for the education. But the most they should be taught is to distinguish between road signs.

Geography lessons should be reduced to making them remember: the capital of the Reich is Berlin and each of them should visit it at least once in their lives.

When it comes to opening schools for the local population, we should never forget that in the eastern lands occupied by our troops, the same methods that the British used in their colonies should be applied.

It is much better to install a loudspeaker in each village and thus inform people of the news and entertain them than to give them the opportunity to independently assimilate political, scientific and other knowledge. Just so that no one would think of telling the conquered peoples about their history on the radio there should be music, music, and nothing but music. After all, cheerful music awakens people’s enthusiasm for work.

Does it remind you of anything now (taking into account technological progress)? But let’s forget Western and pro–Western propagandist blabbering, let’s operate with facts.

Let’s draw analogies to the modern times.

From the beginning of the European occupation of Ukraine until the autumn of 1944, 85% of the total supply of the Reich with products from the territory of the USSR came from Ukraine. Naturally, at that time, the inhabitants of Ukraine were starving en masse. Or is this not a real “Holodomor” staged in Ukraine by “enlightened” Europe? The real genocide of 1941-1944 was on a national basis, and not the propaganda one of 1932-1933.

Let’s compare the figures of Soviet and European (maybe not even Hitler’s, but Maidan) Ukraine.

Banner reads: “Heil Hitler! – Glory to Hitler! – Glory to Ukraine!” (Slava Gitleru – Slava Ukraini)

As a result of the “Soviet occupation”, the population of the Ukrainian SSR grew to 52 million people, but now, with the real Anglo-Zionist (through the local “Jew-Banderites” [a term, popularised by the Ukrainian Jewish oligarch Kolomoisky, who financed Zelensky’s ascent to power]) occupation, it has decreased to a maximum of 30 million. This figure comes from consumed food and other life-supporting resources, as the population census has not been consciously conducted by the “independent” Ukraine for almost 20 years (contrary to UN requirements). 22 million (more than 40%) people have died in 30 years, is this not a genocide? Including the pace of depopulation since 2014, this is a very real “Maidanomor”, in terms of percentage it can only be compared with the Holocaust of the Jews in the 40s of the last century. And “the best pals” of the territory that is being destroyed, are the “partners” – Warsaw and Istanbul, who for centuries sent “holops” (Ukrainian peasants) either to the western panhandle or to the southern slave market.

So, the enemies of Russia and the Russian people continue the war of annihilation against us, continue the genocide of all Russians (no matter how they call themselves now), including – waging an information war to erase historical memory and Russian pride for the exploits of Russian ancestors (the fact that some of their descendants became “Ukrainised” does not influence the nationality of the deceased).

Accordingly, our enemies do not need to be persuaded of anything, they need to be beaten with the truth, our Russian truth.

In the West and among the liberal geeks of Russia, the myth has been spreading for a long time – methodically and systematically – that Nazi Germany attacked the USSR in order to protect itself from a potential threat from the Soviet Union. In 1941, Nazi propaganda told Europeans about the “liberation undertaking of the Wehrmacht forces with their allies, which should destroy the communist dictatorship and return Russia to the ‘path of development of civilised countries’.” Moreover, “Stalin himself plotted to attack the peace-loving Germans.”

According to this Nazi version: “the hope for liberation of Russian people flared up with renewed vigour on June 22, 1941, when German troops, without declaring war, crossed the border of the Soviet Union, and brought freedom from ‘Jewish-Bolshevik enslavement’ to the Russian land.”

But Goebbels’ propaganda wasn’t completing the thought (the Jew-Banderite Borka Filatov with his “promise that scum anything, and we will hang them later” knew from whom to learn) that Russia would be “liberated” not only from the communist regime, but also from any other forms of government, independent of the Third Reich. And most importantly, from a significant part of the population, because Germany was in no need of 190 million slaves.

In Finland: “Relocation camp. Entering the camp and talking through the wire is prohibited under threat of execution by shooting.”

For the needs of the Reich, a tenth part of that would have sufficed – the “spare” ones were planned to be starved or killed, including literally (and not figuratively) “turned into soap, burned in furnaces to produce fertiliser.” In reality, it turned out that the Germans and their vassals, instead of the promised freedom, enthusiastically exterminated the Soviet (mostly Russian) people. Only corpses swinging on gallows, cities and villages destroyed to the ground, as well as moats littered with corpses were left on our land in the wake of the European “civilisers”.

In occupied Kiev, the SS are rummage through the belongings of those shot, ignoring the photographer (“he’s their own!”), in the Babi Yar tract, presumably in a sand quarry north of the modern Dorogozhichi metro station. The photo was taken 10 days after the fall of Kiev by a German military photographer Johannes Hele, who served in the 637th Propaganda Company, which was part of the 6th German Army, which captured the capital of the Ukrainian SSR.

A truly cannibalistic document of Nazi Germany was the “General Plan Ost”, a plan for the enslavement and extermination of the peoples of the USSR on the territories conquered by the Reich (that is, united by Hitler Europe).

According to fascist plans, after the defeat of the USSR, within 25-30 years it was envisaged to destroy and deport 80-85% of the population from Russia, 85% from Lithuania, 65% from Ukraine (a large number of agricultural labourers were supposed to be left there), 75% from Belarus and 50% of residents from Latvia and Estonia.

According to their calculations, 45 million people were supposed to live as slaves in the space subject to German colonisation. At least 31 million of them, who would remain alive, were supposed to be evicted to Siberia for further “disposal”. The “General Plan Ost” was a carefully planned plan for the genocide of races and peoples, primarily the Russian people (all Eastern Slavs) and Jews. In the European plan, it was talked about the widespread expulsion and killing of the local population and the settlement of the territories of the European part of the USSR by the German peasantry.

Riga meets the “liberators” in 1941.

Among those who were suitable for “germanisation” – or racial “renewal” – in accordance with the criteria of the “Nordic type”, were Lithuanians, Estonians and Latvians. Representatives of these peoples were needed in order to use them to manage vast territories in the East. The Balts were more suited for this role than anyone else, because they “were brought up in the European spirit and learned at least the basic concepts of European culture”. The Germans represented the character traits of the Balts as devoted and pedantic performers of the dirtiest work to destroy the “surplus” of the Russian population and perform “security functions” in the East.

In the pre-war years, pedantic Germans, intending to “liberate Russians from the power of the Jewish Bolsheviks,” prepared several genocide projects, unique in their nature, having no precedent in the history of mankind. Projects that provided particularly sophisticated ways to enslave and destroy tens of millions of inhabitants of the European part of the USSR.

If the “Generalplan Ost” defined the boundaries of specific areas of colonisation on the territory of the former Soviet Union, then the plan “der Backe-Plan” (named after Herbert Ernst Backe, State Secretary of the Imperial Ministry of Food and Agriculture of Germany, a native of the city of Batumi [present-day Georgia] of the Russian Empire) provided for the extermination of the Russian population by famine.

An important addition to the hunger plan is the minutes of the meeting of the Secretaries of State. This document, which reflects the intentions of a number of high-ranking officials and senior officers of the Wehrmacht, in particular states:

“The war can be continued only if the Wehrmacht is fully supplied with food from Russia in the third year of the war… At the same time, of course, tens of millions of people will starve to death if we take everything we need out of the country.”

From the twelve orders of State Secretary Herbert Backe on the conduct of the Germans in the East, dated June 1, 1941, it followed that “a wrong decision is better than no decision” on the part of the Wehrmacht soldiers in their actions in Russia. Backe designed a radical “strategy” of famine directed against the civilian population in the occupied Soviet territories.

This plan was lauded and approved by the political and military leadership of the Third Reich. According to it, a large mortality rate was assumed among the population of the Soviet Union, amounting to tens of millions of deaths already during the first year of the German occupation. The implementation of the Backe plan by the Germans led to the mass death of civilians and Soviet prisoners of war in the USSR, who received almost no food.

In total, 4.2 million Soviet citizens died of starvation as a result of the implementation of the genocidal plan in the occupied territory.

Europe never forgave the victory over Nazism…

Three quarters of a century ago, our country – called the Soviet Union – defeated a united fascist Europe, which brought “enlightened” death (in one way or another – genocide) to all the peoples of the “barbaric” USSR.

Earlier for some, later for the others, after they would have been used against first, and then they were also destroyed (like the staff of concentration camps were killed a little later after the prisoners). Hitler’s plans did not include any independent ukraines / baltic states or other national territories of “subhumans”. The selfsame Crimea, in the event of a victory of the Reich, would not have been given to any Tatars, regardless whether those “savages” would have destroyed the partisans or not – according to the German plans, Crimea would have been populated by the “superior race”.

But since our ancestors defeated the united in fascism Europe, back then the political consolidation of the results of the Great Victory in the form of the redistribution of Europe into Soviet and American spheres of influence came to the fore for the Kremlin. For this purpose, the version of personification of responsibility on Hitler’s Germany and Hitler turned out to be “convenient”, its European allies (not to mention the collaborationist territories of the USSR) were presented as “victims”, while France even became one of the winners (despite the fact that its northern part was included in the Reich, and was zealously supported by the “Vichy” part, while only some small military units in some colonies resisted the Nazis).

Almost exclusively Communists and escaped Soviet prisoners of war were actually participating in the resistance movement throughout the “occupied” Europe (and the Polish “resistance” idled for 5 years “with a rifle at its feet” – from autumn 1939 to autumn 1944).

That’s why Europe hates Communists, while in the Nazi countries (like Ukraine) their activities are banned. In the latter, the symbols of Victory over the previous Nazis (Victory Banners and St. George ribbons) are also banned. The inhabitants of the colonies must not remember the victories of their ancestors over the colonisers.

“The best defence is attack”. Therefore, Europe, guilty of the genocide of the Russian people in the 1940s of the 20th century, is busy rewriting history, shifting blame “from a sore head to a healthy one”, replicating various theories: “two totalitarian regimes guilty of World War II”, “Stalin wanted to attack Hitler, so he just defended himself”, “huge losses of peoples of the USSR is connected with the fact that Moscow, which does not know how to fight, flooded the enemy with the corpses of its soldiers”, “Hitler was defeated by the Western allies, the main battles of the Second World War: El Alamein in Africa and the air over England, the Eastern Front is secondary,” etc., etc.

The Portuguese map-caricature is from 1941, appeared shortly before the Nazi-German “Drang nach osten” commenced.
Take note of the dehumanisation of the USSR — projecting onto it their own fear-mongering desires, the same kind projection being at work today.

At the same time, the West is silent about the obvious fact: the whole of continental Europe was for 5 (!!!) years diligently making a significant contribution not to the defeat, but to the strengthening and replenishment of Hitler’s armada (including supposedly neutral Switzerland, which sent thousands of volunteers to “fight the Bolshevik hordes”, and Sweden, which supplied the Third Reich with almost all iron ore for the “war of motors”).

The insular Europe with America was for 3 (!!!) years holding back with the opening of the second front, waiting for the greatest number of casualties on both sides.

It was only when the Red Army reached the borders of the USSR that the Anglo-Saxons decided to enter into a real war so as not to lose the whole of continental Europe. These are all obvious, irrefutable facts. The rest is chatter and propaganda. Well, there were also minor (compared to the scale of the battles of the Eastern Front) skirmishes of small expeditionary corps on the outskirts of colonial empires (in Libya, Egypt, New Guinea, etc.)

The other countries “occupied” by Hitler (for the most part, his voluntary allies, including hundreds of thousands of Polish “SS men” and Bulgarian “brothers” who opposed Russia in every world War), present themselves as “victims”.

The “occupiers” in Belgium

Allegedly, when the “evil Nazis” came, the “normal” Europeans could not fight them (the Communists do not count), but the “Nazis” forced them to work for themselves on pain of death and forcibly mobilised into the Wehrmacht millions of “collaborators”, policemen, “SS men” (though exclusively volunteers), as well as millions from the countries, allied with Germany (though they also had dictators like Mussolini, Salazar, Franco, Horthy, etc., etc. – and Hitler is allegedly alone to blame for this).

If you study the European press, photographs, documents of those years, a completely different picture emerges, a picture in which continental Europe was not “raped” by the Third Reich, but literally enjoyed itself in his “bed”.

It as the “barbaric” Soviet troops, retreating with battles, that blew up industrial enterprises so that they would not fall to the enemy, and the partisans and residents of the occupied Soviet territories, despite the massive terrifying terror with executions of hostages and deportation to penal servitude in the Reich, staged sabotage, subversion, attacks on regular units of the Wehrmacht, police, rear formations of the occupiers.

Meanwhile the “civilised” Europeans worked diligently for Hitler and his allies, receiving salaries, drinking beer after work, visiting stadiums and brothels, a significant part of which pleased in high gear the “heroes of the Eastern Front” on vacation, Europeans from almost all European countries replenished Hitler’s troops in the fight against our country.

In order to fight the united by Germany Europe, the impoverished Soviet Union, which had just recovered from the consequences of a bloody “Civil” War, needed not only soldiers, but also weapons and food. For their production, men were also needed in the rear, who could not be replaced by women or teenagers.

Western Ukraine vs. Eastern Ukraine

Therefore, the USSR was forced to accept women to the front. The Germans did not have such a problem, since they were provided not only with weapons, raw materials, food, resources, finances, industrial power, but also with soldiers from the whole of continental Europe.

Europe fought against us not only on the labour front. Germany did not need to strain its strength, as we did, creating new industries, building factories and blast furnaces, opening hundreds of institutions.

The armament that Germany received in Europe was enough to form 200 divisions.

While we still remember the history and the price of the Great Victory, we will remind those who have already “forgotten”: the troops of Romania, Hungary, Italy, Finland, Slovakia, Croatia fought on the side of Germany in the war against the USSR. In addition, volunteer units fought for the Wehrmacht against the USSR: Spaniards, Belgians, Dutch, French, Danes, Norwegians, Swedes, Poles, Slovaks.

And what about the “proud lyakhs” – Poles? About half a million of them (!!!) fought for Germany.

Polish poster: “Saviour of Europe – In the struggle against Bolshevism, there’s only the German collar!”

Those were volunteers, of whom Himmler personally allowed even the formation of Polish SS units. Similar to Ukrainian, Baltic, French and all the others. What plans of Poland-Ukraine under the German rule were there in the “turnips of the untermensch”, how they “sorted it out” among themselves in Galicia-Volhynia, that was of little interest to Himmler and other German Nazis until the victory over the USSR was secured, but after the triumph of the Reich, the Germans would have “cleared” the “living space” from all this “biological waste” for themselves in a flash. And this is not an assumption, but the truth proven by thousands of documents and testimonies.

The text of the oath of the Polish SS men read: “I swear before God by this sacred oath that in the struggle for the future of Europe in the ranks of the German Wehrmacht I will be absolutely obedient to Supreme Commander Adolf Hitler, and as a brave soldier I am ready at any time to devote my strength to fulfil this oath…”.

Therefore, it can be assumed that 2-3 million people in Poland have a relative who served in the Wehrmacht. They still hate the Russians, who broke the plans of their direct and spiritual ancestors.

While throwing tantrums about the “Molotov-Ribbentrop pact”, the Poles completely “forget” about the earlier “Hitler-Pilsudski pact” concluded 5 years before that (BATS note: well, Hitler bought Pilsudsky, while 15 years before that still, “Pilsudsky bought Petlyura” – a logical movement of substances), and about the complicity of Poles in the Nazi partitioning of Czechoslovakia, and about their zealous complicity in the Holocaust (their only competitors here are Banderites and other Ukrainian “Galicians”), and about half-a-million Poles on the Eastern Front. While the “Home Army” from 1939 to 1944 was waiting “with a rifle at its feet” to see who would start winning, and the “Anders’ Army” (BATS note, see: Reparations to Poland from Russia? And how much does Poland itself in fact owe Russia?) was all this time running from the war all over the Middle East, these “psheks” were actually fighting. The question is only, on whose side – Warsaw is silent “like a fish on ice”.

In “occupied” Poland, 264 large, 9,000 medium-sized and 76,000 small enterprises worked for Germany (!!!). The “noble” and offended “Polish gentry” voluntarily assembled both planes and gathered grain for the Germans, supervised the Jews in concentration camps to produce, under pain of death, explosives for the murder of Soviet citizens.

In an effort to justify its rapid and shameful defeat in the war and its despicable behaviour in the pre-war and war years, the Polish Sejm adopted a resolution on countering the “manipulation of history”. The deputies said that Moscow and Berlin bear “equal responsibility” for unleashing a world war. In its inferiority, Poland decided to “ban Russia from rewriting history”.

Polish politicians do not care that the Soviet people, while the Polish Home Army was shooting them in their backs (after years of waiting “with the rifle at their feet”, being afraid to “sneeze” against the Germans) suffered huge losses (600,000 soldiers), liberating Poland from Hitler (did it want for this “liberation”?), presented the Poles with the German lands of Pomerania, Silesia and the southern part of East Prussia, and after the war invested (tearing away from itself, living in post-war poverty) in the restoration of that country. Moreover, the descendants of the arrogant “polish gentry” somehow “forgot” that in 1939-1944 the Germans killed 6 million Polish citizens, despite the fact that half a million Poles fought in the ranks of the Wehrmacht. Aren’t these the facts that the “lyakhs” want to forbid us to remember as well?

If Soviet Union had not defeated Hitler, not only Russians, but also Poles as a people would have disappeared after a few years.

In addition to the Wehrmacht, armies backed by the resources from all countries of continental Europe marched on our Fatherland, including legions and tens of thousands of SS volunteers from “occupied” France, while with Guderian, every second tank driver was our “Slavic brother” – Czech. Denmark and Spain sent their “liberators” even without declaring war on the Soviet Union, thousands of “activists” from “neutral” Switzerland marched with the Nazis to the East.

Although the share of Germans in the Wehrmacht was higher than the share of the French in the Napoleonic armada of previous “European integrators”, more than 1.8 million “superhumans” from all over Europe fought in Hitler’s army on the Eastern Front. Only the elite troops of Nazi Germany, the SS troops, accepted into their ranks over 400,000 volunteers from other countries.

The Germans formed 59 divisions, 23 brigades and several national regiments and legions from European volunteers. These are such divisions as “Valonia”, “Galicia”, “Bohemia and Moravia”, “Viking”, “Free Corps Denmark”, “Gembez” (?), “Langemark”, “Nordland”, “Netherlands”, “Charlemagne” (see with list). Europeans served as volunteers not only in their national, but also in German divisions.

Danish SS men are going to the Eastern Front

Denmark covered the needs of the German population of the Reich in butter by 10 percent, in meat by 20, in fresh fish by 90 (!!!) percent. (BATS note: see our footnote on page 7 of the Danish underground publication “2Years” concerning how the Germans extracted the supplies from Denmark.) And, of course, the Danish industry fulfilled all German orders. The Norwegians supplied the Nazis with seafood. Belgium and Holland supplied the Germans with coal, cast iron, iron, manganese, zinc and food, including the same fish.

Not only the German population in the rear, but also the German army on the Eastern Front, thanks to the diligent united Europe, did not deny themselves anything.

And another important thing is that all European countries did not require cash payment from the Reich for their products. It promised its allies to pay their costs after the victorious end of the war for the Germans. So the Europeans were waiting for the war’s end, their “vital interest” was vested ni that, and not in any “liberation from fascism”, especially the liberation by the Red Army.

Our victory over Nazism lead to a direct financial loss to the Europeans. (BATS note: Marshal Zhukov famously said: “We freed them, and they will never forgive us for this.”)

They believed in both the financial and territorial promises given by the Fuhrer (for example, for Romania in Novorossiya or for Finland in Karelia and Ingria). Some “hard-core Nazis” still believe in new “their” lands at the expense of Russia, and some of them – “Mai-downs” dream of Ukraine to the Volga and the Caucasus at the expense of NATO’s money and blood (the most ardent appetites extend to the Pacific Ocean). These “jumpers” really “think” that someone will fight for them, and even pay for their territorial “wishes” – a sad madhouse with a clown heading the Getmanate.

In general, the whole of continental Europe, almost all Europeans, went against the “bast-shod” Russia, which had just recovered from the “Civil” War.

Despite the obvious advantage of the European “civilisers – Euro-integrators” three quarters of a century ago, our ancestors “broke off all the buzz” to the West in Hitler’s “bed”. And they they don’t have there (as well as in the Western colonies, whose “heroes” are Bandera/Shukhevichi and other Hitlerite “sixes” – that is, lackeys) the Victory Day. Instead there is a day of mourning (for the Nazis destroyed by our ancestors) and reconciliation (with today’s Nazis).

The banks of “neutral” Switzerland held the finances of the Nazi government, as well as gold bars, which amounted to 3/4 of the gold captured by the Reich. Including gold, melted down from teeth torn from concentration camp victims and jewellery removed from them.

Swiss precision instruments, telephones, walkie-talkies, watches were regularly supplied to the Nazis, and gas for use in concentration camps came from the laboratories of the chemical company “Ciba”. One of the companies that used the slave labour of exported Soviet citizens is Nestle, which is now popular in Russia and Ukraine.

The second European “neutral” state – Sweden supplied Germany with iron ore and steel: a third (!!!) German ammunition and weapons were made from Swedish raw materials, it was the Swedes who supplied the Wehrmacht with the necessary bearings as needed components for German military equipment. In the period from 1941 to 1943 (while Swedish hopes for the Fuhrer’s victory were alive), “Tre kronor” (“The Three Crowns”) provided its territory for the transit of Nazi troops, weapons and cargo, and Swedish King Gustav V in a personal letter of October 1941 (when the fall of Moscow seemed imminent) hurried to thank Adolf for the defeat of Bolshevism.

Here’s Czechoslovakia. Now, head to the East!
The pre-war caricature on the Munich conspiracy by “Kukryniksy”.

Hitler received at his disposal weapons and equipment worth almost 14 billion (!!!) Reichsmarks, coming from 857 factories of the annexed Czechoslvachia. Skoda alone produced more weapons than the entire pre-war Britain. It was Czechoslvachia that created for the Germans the entire fleet of armoured personnel carriers, a huge number of tanks, aircraft, small arms, artillery and ammunition. Without the Czech military industry and Czech tanks, the Germans would not have had four tank divisions, which would have made a Nazi attack on the USSR impossible.

At the same time, the Germans never had to face any acts of sabotage or resistance from the “freedom-loving” Czechs. In addition, Nazi Germany also received the entire 80 tonnes of the Czech gold reserve. And all of that was gifted to Hitler by none other than the Western “democracies” with the Munich Conspiracy of 1938.

While now, the unknown, but very “freedom-loving Czech patriots” are desecrating the monument to the Red Army soldiers who liberated their country from Nazi Germany. And did such Czechs need this “liberation”? After all, they haven’t licked all the German boots yet!

Europe not only worked for Hitler for free under his “guarantees” to pay with Eastern trophies and slaves, but the Europeans also helped Germany by taking on the costs of maintaining the German occupation forces. France, for example, was since the summer of 1940 allocating for these purposes 20 million German marks daily (!!!), and 25 million since the autumn of 1942. In total, European countries donated more than 80 billion (!!!) Deutschmark to Germany for these purposes.

It is debatable how voluntary this “gift” was in each particular country’s case. In any case, before the outbreak of the war with the USSR, Hitler appealed to all Europeans for a “crusade against Bolshevism.” A number of Catholic bishops, following the Fuhrer, hastened to call the invasion of the USSR – a “European crusade”. It is with this period that most of the controversy surrounding Pope Pius XII is connected. Representatives of Jewish organisations consider him responsible for the fact that during the war, the Vatican did not directly and decisively speak out against the Holocaust and did not help persecuted Jews.

And how was the Vatican helping in the genocide of Russians and Orthodox? Why are we silent?

In our time, the destruction of Orthodoxy has been continued by the “tomosos” of Bartholomew – a NATO officer, a graduate of the Jesuit Pontifical Institute.

At Hitler’s call, the European nations stood up “to defend Western civilisation from Soviet barbarism, and any honest assistant in this struggle will be met as an ally…”.

The Fascists created a real anti-Soviet/anti-Russian international of Nazis in the Wehrmacht and the SS troops. The most important thing ut was VOLUNTARY!

France and its entrepreneurs also worked closely with the Germans, were their main suppliers for a whole group of goods. Not to mention agricultural products, by the beginning of the war with the USSR, 1.6 million people were employed in the French “defence industry”, which worked for the Wehrmacht. It was in France that the largest howitzer of the Wehrmacht was produced: its shells weighing more than one and a half tons crumbled the quarters of Leningrad. About 10,000 (!!!) tanks, self-propelled guns and basic vehicles for their creation did France supply Hitler with.

The French tanks of the Wehrmacht.

As Otto Reile, assistant to the head of German military intelligence, stated in Berlin: “The French, without any compulsion, produced in large quantities and without complaints products for our military industry.” In accordance to the plans sent from Berlin, armoured vehicles, howitzers, mortars, anti-tank guns, ammunition were regularly delivered to the Eastern Front from the factories of France – which, at the whim of the allies, was included into the victors of over Hitler, thanks to a small detachment of De Gaulle and 72 pilots of the Normandy-Neman squadron. We’ve heard a lot about these hero pilots. However, their number is “somewhat lost” against the background of the scale with which France provided assistance to Hitler.

And many of us know nothing about the 200,000 French volunteers who fought in the Wehrmacht and in the Legion of French Volunteers.

French volunteers leave for the Eastern Front

In November 1941, the Legion arrived on the Russian front and fought at Borodino, then was used against Russian partisans (a direct parallel with the “European integrators” of Napoleon). In 1944, the Legion became part of the 33rd SS Division “Charlemagne”. As a result, over 23,000 surviving French citizens of the “country-victor over Nazism” turned out to be in Soviet captivity.

The German “occupation” did not at all turn a time of hardships and deprivations for the inhabitants of Paris, and Parisian women humoured the fascists with doubly intensive “labour”. With the arrival of the Germans, the number of “employees” of French brothels increased by six (!!!) times. French women lined up to diligently serve the “Hans and Fritz” arriving from the Eastern Front. These “liberators of Europe from Bolshevism” felt very comfortable there, as French women created a homely atmosphere for German soldiers torn from their homeland. The whole social life in the French capital continued to boil during the Second World War.

And somewhere out there “in the eastern backyards of Europe” there were: besieged Leningrad with children dying of hunger, concentration camps with gas chambers, the Eastern Front bleeding with thousands of deaths every day. At that very same time, dried up from hunger and tears, Russian women ploughed the land, harnessing instead of cattle, or worked for 12-14 hours in production to bring the Great Victory closer, which the “frogs” attached themselves to in 1945.

Not content with their European allies, the Germans actively formed collaborationist units in the occupied lands of the Soviet Union.

There was the Vlasov “Russian Liberation Army”, there were the Nachtigall and Roland battalions, consisting of Ukrainian nationalists, and there were numerous police units. There were tens of thousands of Baltic volunteers who served in the German ground forces, the Luftwaffe, and the SS, but mainly in punitive units.

Lithuanian punishers alone took part in the extermination on the territory of Lithuania of 229,000 Soviet prisoners of war, 220,000 Jews; as well as many thousands of civilians, partisans and soldiers in other regions of the USSR, Poland and Yugoslavia. For Europe, they are “Lithuanian national heroes”, but for us they are bloodthirsty Nazis and accomplices of the Holocaust of Jews and the genocide of the Russian people.

The huge losses of Russians (Eastern Slavs) in the war with Hitler’s Europe are not only due to the fact that they, the “quilted jackets” – who actually fought alone against the whole of the European continent for three years – were opposed by a much more “developed civilisation”. Russians suffered huge losses, two thirds of which were among the civilian population of the Slavic/Russian republics occupied by the previous (in relation to Euromaidan) “Euro-civilisers”, mainly due to the policy of genocide of Russians.

The genocide carried out in the first half of the forties by Hitler’s Europe with the help of local “Galicians”, Bandera, Vlasov, and other collaborators and which is now continued in post-Maidan Ukraine. Only the main form of genocide has changed – now it is not a physical destruction, but the creation of unbearable living conditions, forcing millions of “zarobitchans” (guest workers = ostarbeiters) to leave their homeland and thereby “liberate living space”. (BATS Note: After NATO unleashed the hot phase of the Ukrainian conflict and Britain blocked any hopes for peace, the genocide of the Slavs has again taken a physical form, now roughly called “Europe stand with Ukraine till the last Ukrainian”)

While back then the Hitlerite Europeans pursued a “scorched earth” policy in the occupied Soviet regions, actively destroying “Russian subhumans”.

Not only prisoners of war, communists, commissars, but also the civilian population en masse. Including driving them to work in Germany. At that time, more than 5 million people were abducted from their Motherland (nowadays there are more Ukrainian migrant workers/ostarbeiters in Europe).

The ways Europe carried out the genocide of Russians in the first half of the 40s of the 20th century:

1) Military losses of the Soviet people (consisting of almost 80% of Eastern Slavs, that is, Russians according to the 1939 census) at the fronts and in captivity.

Executions, inhuman conditions of detention of Soviet prisoners of war, depriving them of food and excessive hard labour led to mass deaths.

While the majority of German prisoners of war returned to the “fatherland” (despite the apologies of modern “Kolya from Urengoy”), the vast majority of the Soviet ones were destroyed (and these “Kolyas” and other libertard geeks do not care about them). The Nazis massively tortured Soviet/Russian prisoners of war camps, which turned into real “death factories” for millions of people.

In 1941, Soviet prisoners of war were given a food allowance of about 900 kcal per day, which was almost half the norm necessary for survival. This led to irreversible dystrophy and death from starvation within a few months. Thus, the camps for Soviet prisoners of war on the territory of the Soviet Union in the first half of the war were the same kind of extermination camps as the camps for Jews.

In total, more than three million Soviet prisoners of war died in German camps, primarily from starvation.

And at the same time, well-fed Europe was churning out ammunition and military equipment for the war against the USSR for wages, so that there would be even more exterminated Soviet people (mostly Russians).

Contrary to the libertard myth about “stopping the Germans with own corpses”, the losses on the fronts of the peoples of the USSR and the Third Reich with its satellites are comparable: about 8.5 – 9 million each for the USSR and the Reich with its allies (the latter without taking into account the losses of policemen and collaborators of the occupied Soviet territories, the “people’s” German militia and other auxiliary Nazi formations Europe).

CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 70

One has to wonder, if the Red Army had acted on the principle of “an eye for an eye” and behaved in Europe in the same way as Europeans in the USSR, for example, executing 100 hostages for each killed soldier, would the “liberals” also have declared that the Germans “did not know how to fight and filled up the Soviet Union with their own corpses”? But our ancestors were not fascists, they could not match the Europeans…

Only during the liberation of Europe did the irretrievable losses of the Red Army amount to:

in Poland — 600,212 people;
in Hungary — 140,004 people;
in Czechoslovakia — 139,918 people;
in Germany — 101,961 people;
in Romania — 68,993 people;
in Austria — 26,006 people;
in Yugoslavia — 7,995 people;
in Norway — 3,436 people;
in Bulgaria — 977 people.

Thus, out of about 9 million irretrievable losses of the Red Army, about a million of the fallen are Soviet soldiers who died during the liberation of Europe from fascism. Liberation, which most Europeans did not need at that time, and so, respectively, now their descendants perceive it not as liberation, but as “occupation”.

In total, more than 5.7 million Great Russian, 1.4 million Ukrainian, 253 thousand Belarusian soldiers fell on the battlefields of the Great Patriotic War, in total: more than 7.3 million Russian victims of the Soviet-German front.

In almost every settlement in Russia, Ukraine (except for the Bandera regions), Belarus, there is a memorial to fallen countrymen with dozens, hundreds, thousands of surnames of fathers-grandfathers-great-grandfathers who did not return from the war. That is why that war has forever become a Patriotic war for our people. (BATS note: and that is why Bandera Ukraine is systematically destroying all these memorials – to erase this memory)

2) Famine and mass murder of civilians in the occupied territories.

Of the almost 27 million Soviet casualties, civilian casualties amounted to about 18 million, that is, more than two thirds. Not only Jews, Communists and Komsomol members, the entire population of the Soviet territories occupied by the Nazis (mainly Slavic, that is, Russian republics) was subjected to mass terror and actual genocide by the Europeans.

And the “enlightened” Europe does not succeed in blaming just Hitler and just the Gestapo for the deaths of millions of civilians. The hands of many soldiers of the Reich and its allies, not to mention the appendages of the local policemen/Bandera and other collaborators, were elbow-deep in the blood of the civilian population.

The rules of “behaviour” of professional killers of civilians were instilled in every disciplined Wehrmacht soldier. For example, in one of the points of the “Memo of a German soldier” it was written:

“You don’t have a heart and nerves, you don’t need them in war. Destroy pity and compassion in yourself, kill every Russian, do not stop if you are facing an old man or a woman, a girl or a boy. Kill, thereby you will save yourself from death, secure the future of your family and become famous forever…”

And here is what the worthy son of the German people, Hans Heil, wrote home in July 1941, who also came to “liberate” us:

“Russians are real cattle. The order is not to take anyone prisoner. Any means to destroy the enemy is correct. Otherwise, it is impossible to deal with this rabble. We cut off the Russian prisoners’ chins, gouged out their eyes, and cut off their bottoms. There is one law here, merciless destruction. Everything should proceed without the so-called humanism. Shots are being fired in the city every minute. Each shot means that another humanoid Russian animal has been sent to the right place…”

Here is just one episode of that genocide of Russians.

On January 22, 1942, Soviet troops, having liberated the last settlement of the Moscow region, Uvarovka, were horrified by the traces of the atrocities of Western “civilisers”, including the fact that European fascists burned alive almost all residents of the village of Ragzino near Moscow.

The Hitlerites captured 37 districts of the Moscow region for only three months, but this short-term occupation turned out to be the most severe in terms of scale, the nature of destruction and casualties. Mass extermination of civilians was recorded in all 37 districts.

In the former Uvarovsky district (now these lands are part of the Mozhaisk district), 95 out of 212 settlements were completely destroyed by the Nazis, that is, almost half (most of them were never restored). And that all happened in just 3 months of occupation!

Question: so, in how many months would the Germans “finally solve the Russian question” in the Moscow region, if its “liberation from the Communists” lasted for longer?

If this is not a genocide of the peaceful Russian population, then what is it? And after all, this happened in most of the East Slavic lands occupied by the united Europe.

3) The export of the population for hard labour in Germany.

The theft of the most able-bodied part of the Soviet population for hard labour in Germany and the neighbouring industrialised satellite countries caused great damage to the Soviet population under occupation. In Germany, Soviet slaves were called “ostarbeiters”, they were fiercely hated, mocked and despised by local residents.

Female slaves from the East…

In total, more than 5.2 million people were forcibly taken to the Reich, of which only about 2 million returned home, about three million people died, and a small part remained in the West for one reason or another.

4) Losses of the urban population as a result of hostilities and blockades (which modern Nazis dream to implement for Crimea and Donbass).

The largest decrease in population was as a result of military operations and blockades in such cities: Leningrad, Voronezh, Rostov-on-Don, Stalingrad, Sevastopol, Kerch, Novorossiysk.

The number of dead civilians in Leningrad alone exceeded the number of victims of World War II for the United States (420 thousand people) or Great Britain (with losses of 450 thousand colonies) and France (660 thousand, although some of them were on the Eastern Front as part of the Wehrmacht) – the allies of the USSR in the anti-Hitler coalition. Meanwhile, the “allied” Paris did not resist, but flourished under occupation. It’s just that according to Hitler’s plans, all residents of captured Moscow and Leningrad were to be destroyed along with the Russian capitals.

Before the start of the blockade, Leningrad was the second most populous city in the USSR, with 3.2 million people living in it. By September 1941, the population of Leningrad and its suburbs was about 2.9 million people. The siege of Leningrad, according to various estimates, claimed the lives of 600,000 to 1.5 million residents of the city. 3% of people died from Nazi bombing, and the remaining 97% died from starvation. According to one estimate, over 1,413,000 people became victims of the Nazis, which is 57.6 percent of all Leningraders.

In Stalingrad and Voronezh, which the Nazis never managed to completely capture, there were such losses of the urban population: in Stalingrad, at the time of the expulsion of the enemy, only 12.2% of the inhabitants remained, in Voronezh — 19.8% of the pre-war population.

The Nazis began the genocide of the civilian population of Rostov-on-Don from the first days of the occupation. Already on July 25, 1942, they shot the boys from house number 40 on Ulyanovsk Street – Vitya Protsenko, Kolya Zyatin, Igor Neygof and two of their friends for harbouring seriously wounded Soviet soldiers. On the next day, when Field Marshal List together with the Japanese ambassador and the commander of the 1st Panzer Army of the Wehrmacht, Baron Ewald von Kleist, entered the city captured by the enemy, the German guards put a row of our prisoners of war lying on the road and a German tank “ironed” the defenceless people.

In total, Hitler’s Europeans and their mutts destroyed the civilian population in the occupied territory of the USSR: more than 6.9 million Russians, 6.5 million Ukrainians, 1.7 million Belarusians and from 2 to 2.5 million Jews. For some reason, they talk about one Holocaust, but everyone “forgot” about the genocide of the Russian people by Europe, united by Hitler.

The (Galician) girls are seeing their boys off to war – under the SS banners.

An now, let’s “admire” the modern “miracles” of Western propaganda: the president of an East Slavic country that lost a quarter of its population in 1941-1945 calls it “not our war” (BATS note: that was stated by Belorussia’s Lukashenko on October 26, 2019 – at that time he was trying to sit on two chairs with one butt, and flirt with the West), while the president of another East Slavic country (Ukraine), which lost a fifth of its inhabitants during these years, glorifies and celebrates the anniversaries of obvious accomplices (in the ranks of all kinds of “Fuhrers”) those who zealously participated in the Holocaust not only of the blood relatives of this president (BATS note: here the author alludes to the Jewish lineage of Zelensky), but also in the genocide of the Slavic population of “his” country.

No matter what the modern “Ne-rus” (Russians who denounced their roots, the “mankruts”) broadcasts, most of the victims of the Nazi regime were representatives of the Russian world: these are Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians.

However, united now by the Anglo-Zionist (modern fascists) Europe does not repent, but on the contrary – it i sprecisely in the Russians that they are trying to instil a complex of guilt for the victory of their ancestors over fascist Europe and an inferiority complex for that supposedly “incorrect victory”.

This is facilitated by the fact that the Polish leaders, maddened by Russophobia, and with them American, German diplomats and Baltic mutts loudly declare to the whole world that the Russians and the Germans (Stalin and Hitler) started the Second World War and therefore, together with the Germans, the Russians must bear responsibility for it.

The most ridiculous thing in this theatre of absurdity is that Russia is accused by those, whose countries either fought for Hitler, or whose countries contributed to Hitler’s triumphant rise to power in 1933, signed various agreements with him since 1934, and already in 1938 surrendered to him, or even shared Czechoslovakia with him, by making precisely the Munich Agreement a necessary for hitler component of the Second World War (it provided the Fuhrer with weapons for it), after which they helped Hitler in every possible way in the genocide of the Russian people.

At the same time, the European leaders of the 1930s were well aware that any agreement or action in the field of foreign policy that strengthened the potential of the Reich, also increased Hitler’s ambitions, and therefore increased the risks of Nazi aggression. They only hoped to direct it to the East (they clearly read Mein Kampf), and did everything to destroy the Soviet Union and the Russian people they hated, by the hands of Nazi Germany. And for the sake of this, it was no pity to hand over to the Germans the stinking “hyena of Europe” represented by Poland, stupefied by its arrogance. No matter how puffed up the “honourable” Poles are, they have always been and are second-class people for the West: “Polish plumbers”.

After all this, questions arise: if Germany was not alone, why should only Germany have to pay for decades? The main thing is, why do they pay only to the Jews?

Why should Russia, as the legal successor of the Soviet Union, not bill Germany and all its former European accomplices for all the troubles they brought to the inhabitants of the USSR, for 27 million dead (which is more than four times the number of Jews exterminated by the Nazis) – 15% of the population of the pre-war USSR, for thousands cities and villages, wiped off the face of the earth, for a third of the destroyed pre-war assets of the Soviet Union, for the genocide of the Russian people?

Or are Soviet people (including the Jews) inferior to the Polish, Hungarian, German, Romanian, Italian, French, Dutch and other “European” Jews?

A myriad army of pseudoscientists, publicists, bloggers, Russophobic haters and other “opinion leaders” who have bred both in the West and in Russia use fictitious or falsified “documents”, outright lies and manipulation (example: mentioning the Brest Agreement and “forgetting” the earlier and numerous treaties of the West with Hitler, as well as the peculiarities of the “strange war” of 1939-1940 with him) in order to substantiate the propaganda thesis about the “criminality” of the Soviet Union.

It is obvious that in this way the West is trying to distract attention from the terrible crimes committed by the Nazis (not only German ones) and European collaborators in their service on the territory of the Soviet Union, trying to hide the undeniable fact that it was the West that gave birth to and nurtured Hitler, and it was the west that also tried to direct his aggression only to the East. At the same time, in modern Europe, there is an intensified rehabilitation of the Nazis responsible for the “Russian Holocaust”. Moreover, no one has brought Europe to account for past crimes against the Russian people, although such crimes do not have a statute of limitations.

The silencing of the genocide of the Russian people in the past may lead to its genocide in the future.

Now the wretched “Young Europeans” (Eastern Europe) and Russian liberals, inflated by Russophobia and their own impunity, have simply (and “simplicity is worse than theft”) “forgotten” who extinguished the furnaces of Auschwitz, Majdanek, Treblinka and Buchenwald, who saved not only the Jews but also all the Slavs from destruction.

Seeing the “lack of response” (as a result of irresponsibility), everyone and their dog poked and continues to poke Russians in the face with their own sores and grievances?

“Galicians-politzais”, Poles, Hungarians, Romanians, Czechs and Slovaks, Finns and Balts in a mutual chorus continuously howl in one voice about the unthinkable losses “from these terrible and bloodthirsty Russians”. At the same time, with fading and intense salivation, they continuously calculate the moral and material damage, and do not get tired of reminding that “no one is forgotten and nothing is forgotten”. Even the Germans, whose cow certainly has no right to moo, they also bleat about the “millions of citizens of the Reich raped by wild barbarians”. (BATS note: see Millions of raped German women: where the legs grow from? Reblog of a detailed research article)

But the scariest thing is that our younger generation of “button-puhers”, with such an attitude to history, can start saying the same things in a few years.

At the same time, Western and pro-Western “truth-lovers” persistently urge only Russians to constantly repent and be more modest, not to remember, “not to comb and not to kindle”. This is how liberal Europe and “libertad” Russia perceive any attempts to remember the victims of the horror that the Germans and their European henchmen committed on the territory of the Soviet Union against the Soviet people.

Oh, how much would the modern Nazis and globalists like us to repent for our “quilted jacket-clad” great-grandfathers who dared to break the neck of the fascists, while Europe lay down under them, relaxed and enjoyed working it out not only in the factories of the Reich, but also with the massive replenishment of Hitler’s troops on the Eastern Front. And did she (Europe) need, satisfied, that liberation from the fascists?

The “correctly” trained by “Katz” grandchildren – great-grandchildren of these “stupid” soldiers, who did not provide their descendants with Bavarian beer and sausages (some of the untermensch could have been kept by “higher race” for harvesting grain and pine nuts, while the ancestors of the Zelensky-Gordons would have all been turned into the lampshades), are sent to Berlin to repent for the “quilted jackets” who did not allow Germans, Hungarians, Romanians, Finns, Dutch, Belgians, French, Norwegians, Danes, Czechoslovaks, Poles, Italians, Croats, Spaniards, Balts, Galician rogues and other “democratisers who did not want war” to reach Volga and further to oil-bearing Baku and Urengoy.

I wonder how many Europeans apologised for the genocide of Russians in the Stae Duma?

But we will not keep silent and forget, we will not betray our ancestors. The theme of the history of the Second World War will constantly lead all conscientious researchers to the history of cooperation between European countries and the Third Reich, the participation of their peoples in the Holocaust, and their armies in the genocide of the Eastern Slavs.

That is: Poles, Balts, Bandera of Ukraine and other heirs of Hitler’s accomplices, including those who for five (!) years from 1939 to 1944 did not fight with Hitler, but waited “with a rifle at their feet” (like the Polish Home Army) or ran from the war throughout the Middle East (like the Polish Anders’ army) – they will achieve that, wanting to get onto Russian money, they will receive the oppiste effect – they will launch the process of “restitution” against themselves. And they will, like Germany, pay for decades, and this time not only to the Jews, but Russians too.

As a lesson for the future, it is necessary to ask the European heirs of the Nazis and their accomplices for the genocide of the Russian people during the Second World War in full.

Because it has already been proven that as a result of the pan-European aggression, it was the Russian people who suffered the greatest losses in World War II. They basically broke the neck of European fascism: the Third Reich and its “mutts” suffered more than 4/5 of their losses on the Eastern Front. It was there that the most combat-ready, and not the rear units of the Nazis (or those who rushed into voluntary captivity to the Western Allies) fell.

Of course, our enemies want to steal our Victory, they dream that millions of “Kolyas from Urengoy” and native Nazis from various tribes of “untermensch” will grow up among us, who will fight among themselves, facilitating the “higher race” the final solution of the Russian question.

The Western propaganda has brought to us not only pop culture and the sex revolution (including all possible forms of perversion and degeneracy). It (9/10 of the world’s mass media) also brought its own vision of history. A history in which there is virtually NOTHING LEFT of the truth.

On the other hand, the vast majority of Americans and Europeans are confident that the main role in World War II was played by the United States (“Hollywood does not lie”), which, as many believe, was fought then not only with Germany, but also with the USSR. Why be surprised if a third (!!!) of the Japanese schoolchildren are convinced that it was the Soviet Union that dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and many residents of Hamburg and Dresden think that it was the Soviet aircraft that levelled their cities along with hundreds of thousands of civilians.

A few more such films/cartoons/computer games on this topic – and our teenagers will be convinced of all this (if we keep our silence). “Those who do not remember their past will lose their future.” A nation that has forgotten its history is doomed to death and oblivion.

Whimpering and whining in the German parliament, “Kolyas from Urengoy” are multiplying in the Russian information space. Why remember now about Ukraine, whose official “heroes” were Abwehr Bandera and SS Shukhevych? But it is necessary to remember. It was Shukhevych who wrote that if only half of the population of Ukraine remains, then “it’s perfectly fine”. No, already now only half of it is left, and it is already scary for those whose brains are not covered by the propaganda “pot”.

But the most terrible thing is yet to come – the West is conducting a “final solution to the Russian question” (starting with the borderland part of the Russian people).

Let’s draw conclusions.

In the Great Patriotic War, the USSR, with an initial population of 190 million people, fought not with 80 million Germans of that time, but with the whole of continental Europe, whose number (without island England) was about 400 million.

Comparing the volumes of industrial (including “defence” complex) and agricultural production, the size of gold reserves and capital of the united Europe and the USSR in 1941 is generally ridiculous. In addition to the “cannon fodder” for the Eastern Front, the Europeans provided Hitler with a diligent “family” of 150 millions (!!!) of employees. In addition to voluntary workers on a salary, the Germans “employed” for free the “ostarbeiters” taken out of the USSR and Jews in ghettos/concentration camps.

How, under all these conditions, our ancestors were able to stand up and defeat Hitler’s united Europe is already a mystery to our current generation. And the next ones, I’m afraid, won’t believe it at all. Moreover, all Western and pro-Western propaganda has been working on this disbelief for a long time.

It is our sacred duty to protect the memory and history of the Great Victory of our ancestors.

In order to survive and ensure the future of our children, we all need to remember: it was our fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers who laid their precious lives on the altar of the Great Victory against the fascist regimes of cannibalistic Europe. To protect their memory, the memory of their Great Victory over fascism, is our sacred cause.

So, with what can we oppose the false globalist propaganda? Our Russian truth. The truth about the Great War and the Great Victory, the truth about how Europe participated in the genocide of our people in the forties of the 20th century.

Since our word and deed are right, Victory will be ours again!


As an afterword

On May 6, 2025, on the 80th anniversary of the Geate Victory, “Russian Newspaper” (freedom-of-speeched in EU) wrote on their Telegram channel:

The genocide of the Soviet people must come to light

Alexander Bastrykin, head of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation:

“International recognition of the fact of the genocide of the Soviet people by the fascists during the Great Patriotic War is our duty to the memory of the millions of victims.”

Celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945, we pay tribute to the memory of the victims of these tragic events in world history. The consequences of the war were destroyed cities, wiped off the face of the earth along with the inhabitants of villages and settlements, destroyed monuments and plundered cultural and historical values, but above all a huge number of broken destinies.

“The fascists were supposed to exterminate through food deprivation from 20 to 30 million inhabitants of the USSR, including the population of Moscow and Leningrad.”

27 million lives is the price that the Soviet Union paid for its Victory over Nazi Germany. More than half of the victims are civilians.

These are women and children, the elderly and the sick, Slavs and Jews, and representatives of other nationalities who were shot, burned, starved, and tortured to death in concentration camps, forced labour, and deprived of their lives by the Nazis and their henchmen.

👉 Read Alexander Bastrykin’s exclusive interview on the RG website.

Regarding the coming march of the Ukrainian Neo-Nazis in London on May 8

Reading time: 3 minutes

Russia’s MFA Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s comment at the Telegram channel of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs:

According to a report by Sky News, the neo-Nazis of the Ukrainian Armed Forces will participate in the VE Day procession in London on May 8.

The country has not seen anything like this for nearly 90 years since the infamous Cable Street march, when Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists was granted official permission to march through London’s East End in October 1936 – an event widely regarded as a shameful chapter in British history.

At that time, many showed support for the British Fascists in London. There were still nearly two years left until the 1938 Munich Agreement – the example of Britain’s appeasing Hitler. England still demonstrated conscience and dignity as anti-fascist activists and some concerned police officers managed to disrupt the far-right and anti-Semite procession in the city.
But this time, London will actually see them march.

Surprisingly, the British authorities’ rationale behind the decision is the Kiev regime’s confrontation with Russia, which is cited directly by Sky News.

This evokes disturbing historical parallels of Great Britain’s notorious insidiousness.

For instance, Winston Churchill, who took part in the Yalta and Potsdam conferences along with the other Big Three leaders, publicly affirmed the alliance with the USSR while addressing Soviet people and Generalissimo Joseph Stalin, and praised the Red Army’s sacrifices. However – as we all know it now – behind closed doors, he authorised the drafting of Operation Unthinkable, a secret plan for a potential Allied invasion of the Soviet Union.

These plans (Operation ‘Unthinkable’) remained classified for half a century until they were finally released by the British General Staff in 1988. Apparently, MI5 and MI6 thought that the Soviet Union, which was on the verge of collapse at the time, would have its historical memory buried, and the publication of these materials would no longer compromise London.
Continue reading