At the site of History.rf, the “Russian Military Historic Society” and historian Yegor Yakovlev published for the first time an unknown until now speech of Adolf Hitler. The publication is from July 27, 2023.
This publication, this document is something that needs to be shown to the brainwashed Ukrainians, who are brought up with the idea that Hitler was the “liberator” of Ukraine, as we showcased in an earlier article Indoctrination of the Ukrainian children with the Nazi ideology!
We have newly presented another work by Yegor Yakovlev in the article “How falsification of history works in our reality”, a lecture by Yegor Yakovlev.
“My mission, if I succeed, is to destroy the Slavs,” Adolf Hitler said in a conversation with Romanian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mihai Antonescu. During their meeting in Berlin on November 27, 1941, Hitler openly declared plans for the genocide of the Slavs.
Yegor Yakovlev, an expert at the “Russian Military Historical Society” and head of the “Digital History” project, found the recording of the negotiations and translated its full text into Russian for the first time. The document is published on the portal HISTORY.RF. The original of the so-called “meeting record” is kept in the archives of the “National Council for the Study of Security Archives” in Bucharest.
Word to Yegor Yakovlev:
It was known earlier of the existence of such a document. Together with other captured materials, it was taken to Moscow and ended up in the archive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the USSR. There, the Soviet historian Alexei Shevyakov, who was preparing the monograph “The Economic and Military-political Aggression of German Imperialism in Romania: 1936-1941”, managed to work with him. This book was published in 1963, and there, in a modest footnote, I saw for the first time quotes from the dialogue between Antonescu and Hitler about plans to destroy the Slavs. However, my appeal to the archive was unsuccessful: it turned out that in Hrushyov’s time a large body of documents, including those of interest to me, had been returned to Bucharest. Fortunately, in 2013, a recording of the negotiations between Hitler and Antonescu was published in the twelfth issue of the Romanian scientific journal “Zargidava”. The publication from the archives of the National Council for the Study of Security Archives in Bucharest was carried out by Gheorghe Buzatu, Professor of History at the University of Iasi, an ambiguous nationalist historian. Nevertheless, the document, introduced by him into scientific circulation, speaks for itself.
During Mihai Antonescu’s conversation with Adolf Hitler in Berlin on November 27, 1941, the Romanian leadership discussed issues that were of great concern. The first part of the recording is devoted to Romanian-Hungarian relations, which, despite the presence of both countries in the orbit of Nazi Germany, were extremely tense. In 1940, as a result of the Second Vienna Arbitration, Hungary took over Northern Transylvania from Romania with a mixed Romanian-Hungarian population. In this dispute, the Nazi leadership sided with the Hungarians, promising compensation to the Romanians at the expense of the USSR. However, despite these promises, the loss of Northern Transylvania was felt very painfully in Bucharest. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer about the severe discrimination of Romanians in the excluded region, asking him to intervene and achieve a “fair solution”.
The second part of the dialogue was entirely devoted to the “Slavic question”. Antonescu informed the Fuhrer that Romania was a categorical opposed to the creation of an independent Ukraine, of which projects he was aware. The Romanian politician pointed out that Slavs are a huge “biological problem” for Europe, referring to the large number of “primitive” Slavic populations that are incompatible with European culture and civilisation. If, after the defeat of the USSR, an independent Ukraine appears, according to Antonescu, it will begin to draw the rest of the Eastern Slavs into its orbit and turn into a new threat to Europe. This, the Romanian Foreign Minister argued, should not be allowed.
Of particular interest are Hitler’s answers to the remarks of the interlocutor. The Fuhrer immediately agrees that the Slavs pose not an ideological, but a biological problem for Europe, speaks of the extreme danger of the “Russian problem” and argues that it is necessary to jointly find methods for the “biological elimination of the Slavs”. Next, the head of the Third Reich talks about conquering the living space in the East and says that his mission, if he can only fulfil it, is to destroy the Slavs.
These were not just statements – the policy of exterminating the indigenous populations of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus had already been carried out by the Nazis quite consistently by the autumn of 1941. The Nazis saw hunger as their main tool, which became a means of exterminating Soviet prisoners of war and residents of large cities. The most monstrous famine was organised to drive out the residents of Leningrad, but, for example, the populations of Kiev and Harkov were also destroyed by artificial starvation. Special actions by the SS and the police, with the support of the Wehrmacht, were supposed to complement this organised humanitarian catastrophe. The occupation regime was planned in such a way as to cause huge mortality among indigenous peoples and thereby “solve the biological problem” that Hitler and Antonescu spoke about on November 27, 1941. At the same time, Jews and Gypsies were subject to total extermination.
In light of the above, the recording of the conversation between Mihai Antonescu and Adolf Hitler is of great importance for historical research. Yegor Yakovlev is preparing a scientific publication of the document. We present our readers with a lengthy fragment dedicated to the fate of the Slavs.
FROM THE TEXT OF THE DOCUMENT:
Meeting of Mihai Antonescu and Adolf Hitler in Berlin, November 27, 1941, Berlin
…Then I asked the Fuhrer to explain to me his point of view on the Ukrainian issue, since there are some elements of the German army in Bukovina who are acting in favour of the Ukrainians, and the Romanian government will have to take a stance on the Ukrainian problem in Romania soon. And I openly say that this position can only be against the Ukrainian element.
I explained to the Fuhrer that this was not a matter of internal order, but a concept of general order that I was obliged to present to him. For me, the great problem of restoring Europe to a peaceful tomorrow is the solution of the Slavic question.
The Slavic question is much more acute and dangerous for Europe today than the pressure of the German people on Europe was for Richelieu and Mazarin in the Westphalian era. The German people belonged to the European civilisation. The German people were in the center of Europe and had institutions compatible with the civilised Europe; yet the Westphalian concept was supposed to immobilise the Germanic bloc, divide it into hostile states and monarchies in order to prevent its unity and ensure, through counter-force, the impossibility of its expansion.
And for many years, the Slavic mass has done nothing but transform and move forward, being completely incompatible with the European spirit, with the civilisation of Europe. Communism is nothing more than a spiritual expression of the Slavic race.
The large and primitive Slavic mass is not a spiritual problem for Europe, but a serious biological problem related to the European birth rate. It is necessary to find radical and serious solutions to this problem, and I believe that all European states should be involved in this activity, because otherwise Europe will achieve only temporary peace and will work for the Slavs.
The joining of Latinism, on a racial basis, to the actions of Germanism against the Slavs seems to me to be a necessity of the first order, and the position regarding the Slavs should be unshakable, any formula for separation, neutralisation, occupation of Slavic territories is legitimate.
That is why I believe that the formation of the Ukrainian state, and especially of a large Ukrainian state, is a mistake on a pan-European scale, and I also believe that the excessive territorial strengthening and expansion of Bulgaria is an action for the benefit of the Slavs.
In any case, for Romania, a Grand Ukraine or a Grand Bulgaria means that the Slavic problem persists, if not starts getting worse. Because the Ukrainian state on our borders, based on nationalist principles and transformed into a Slavic core that attracts the protoplasm of the Slavic masses from abroad, and a united and powerful Bulgaria in the Balkans, only pinch Romania between two flanks more threatening than ones of yore. The Romanian people are anti-Slavic and have always been anti-Slavic, as well as naturally anti-Semitic.
Therefore, Romania should be used in Germany’s new actions and not weakened by the Slavic formations encircling and surrounding its borders.
In conclusion, I said that we, Romanians, fully trust the Fuhrer’s cause of peace and reconstruction, and Marshal Antonescu confidently linked his Romanian fate with the German one in the fight against communism and the Slavs in order to save the Romanian nation.
The Fuhrer began with a heated discussion of the great Slavic problem, giving me the honour on three occasions to accept my point of view on European reconstruction. As a basis for the conversation, the Fuhrer openly told me:
“You are right, the Slavic problem is biological, not ideological, as you said, and the fight against the Slavs should be waged by all Europeans.”
In the future Europe there should be only two races: Latin and Germanic. These two races must work together in Russia to destroy (literally: dărâma, that is “demolish”) the Slavs. We cannot march out against Russia with legal or political formulas, because the Russian problem is much more serious than many people think, and we must find solutions to colonise and biologically eliminate the Slavs.
That is why all European nations should work together in the fight against the Slavs, and tomorrow jointly transform Russia for Europe.
Why should the Belgians have 224 inhabitants per square kilometer when there are such huge spaces in Russia?
Why should my West Germans live in difficult conditions when the spaces in the East offer them a future?
My mission, the Fuhrer said, if I succeed, is to destroy the Slavs.