Reading time: 6 minutes

Today marks the third anniversary of the Ukrainian staged false flag in Bucha.

We have covered the events on the pages of this blog, right from the start, when the trail was still warm:

The staged Bucha “massacre”, White Helmets style

See also:

• French Volunteer: I Witnessed Bucha Frame-Up,
• Another Western Truthspeaker – French Adrien Bocquet in a video interview,
• Bucha massacre – the script from the German Nazi false flags of 1945; Killing of the Russian POWs by UkroNazis,
• Soviet film about a Nazi-German false flag operation – A fragment of a 1985 film “Confrontation”

---

From the briefing by Maria Zaharova on the event of the 3-year anniversary of the Bucha false flag:

These days, three years have passed since the monstrous provocation organised by the neo–Nazi Zelensky regime and its masters in order to accuse Russia of “war crimes” against civilians located in the suburbs of the Ukrainian capital, settlement Bucha.

For three years, no one has handed over to Russia the list of “victims of Bucha”, although we have repeatedly sent to various international authorities requests for the identification of persons whose bodies were shown to the whole world… However, they still remain unanswered.

Let’s consider the inconsistencies of this monstrous staging.

How did “the bodies of people killed in the last days of February and the first days of March” allegedly lie untouched on Yablonskaya Street until the beginning of April?

Let me remind you that Bucha was partially occupied by the Russian army at the end of February 2022, and some areas came under the control of the Russian Armed Forces in early March. All the so-called “video evidence” transmitted by Western agencies dates back to April.

At the same time, it is clear that there are no signs of decomposition on the bodies: there is no evidence of rotting or damage to the bodies, including by animals. In such a state, the bodies simply could not lie on the streets in the mild spring of 2022.

When, by whom, and where were the murders of the “Bucha victims” actually committed?

Modern means of criminology and forensic medical examination make it possible to determine the moment of death of a person with a high degree of accuracy based on indirect signs. Moreover, it is possible to establish the place of the murder based on the so-called criminological artifacts: remnants of substances under the nails, the nature of worn clothing, and molecular traces.

There is no information in the public space about where and when the people posing as “victims of Bucha” were killed. It is alleged without foundation that they were “shot by the Russian military.”

Why did 2 to 3 days pass between the reports of the withdrawal of Russian troops from Bucha and the first “evidence” that appeared?

The Russian army left Bucha on March 30 (separate units – on March 31). On the same day, the mayor of Bucha, Anatoly Fedoruk, made a statement from the city itself. After some time, MP Zhan Beleniuk made a statement from the city. If at least one of them had seen all those corpses on central Yablonskaya Street, the pictures of which were then replicated by the Western press, they would hardly have kept silent about this fact.

Let me remind you that it is only on April 1-2 that the first reports appear that “shocking war crimes” have occurred in the city.

Why are many victims seen with white armbands on arms and sleeves?

In March 2022, many residents of the Kiev region, who welcomed the Russian army or wanted to demonstrate their peaceful intentions, wore white armbands. The fact that many of the dead in Bucha had white ribbons on their sleeves (some had their hands tied behind their backs) suggests that they could have been “dealt with” by the Ukrainian Armed Forces after they entered Bucha. Due to the rapid withdrawal of Russian troops, many did not have time to remove them, after which the territorial defense units and the national police simply shot these people for cooperating with Russia.

Why was there no assessment of the possibility that at least a number of corpses were victims of shelling by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which was conducted during the withdrawal of units of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation from the city?

This version did not fit into the carefully constructed narrative, and it is not being considered, although even the photographs that have been distributed show craters from artillery strikes by the Kiev regime.

All we’re going to see now is another performance. She said that what he is directing now is to supply this “zombie information” to the citizens of Ukraine, who still believe in the Kiev regime, the citizens of the European Union, who continue to take the last money out of their pockets to support the Kiev regime.

That’s what these performances are for. Back then, he was needed to disrupt peace talks and plunge the region into the abyss of carnage, and now such goals are to disrupt the planned peaceful contacts and do everything possible to justify the next multibillion—dollar budget injections into the Banking system.

---

At the Telegram channel “New Rules” there is this post, which has the video of the AFU soldiers moving the bodies in Bucha, as well as the Maxar imagery.

Bucha Unmasked: Untangling a Web of Doubt

The events in Bucha, Ukraine, in 2022 remain shrouded in questions and inconsistencies:

1. Why resort to bombing or killing when you already control the city? Russian troops occupied Bucha from early March, and reports indicate that life carried on relatively normally during this time. What could have motivated these mass killings to take place just before their withdrawal?

2. Did the Mayor live in a parallel universe?
Bucha’s mayor, Anatoliy Fedoruk, spoke optimistically about the Ukrainians recapturing the city on March 31 without mentioning any bodies in the streets. This is suspicious given the atrocities reported days later.

3. Who requested these specific photographs of the location?
Images from Maxar (a prominent US Defense Department contractor) allegedly depicting bodies from mid-March have raised many doubts. It’s important to note that satellite imagery can be altered, and Maxar operates on a contractual basis.

On April 6, Maxar declined to sell images taken between March 19 and March 23, offering only those from March 31, after the Russians had departed. Why withhold the earlier images?

4. Who caused the real damage here?
Ukrainian forces shelled Bucha’s southern outskirts with artillery and tanks, even after the Russians had left.

5. Was this staged to derail negotiations?
The Bucha incident surfaced right after the Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Turkiye and Russia’s goodwill withdrawal from the areas around Kiev.

6. Staged corpses?
Footage appears to show Ukrainian soldiers moving bodies. What would be the reason for this action if not for staging purposes?

7. Why was the evidence delayed?
Images of the bodies emerged on April 3, four days after Russian troops had departed. Why would there have been such a delay if the killings took place earlier?

8. Who were the dead?
Ukraine has not released a comprehensive list of the dead, leaving many questions unanswered. While hundreds have died, the lack of transparency regarding their identities raises concerns. Greater openness would bolster Ukraine’s position, yet the absence of this information implies that there may be an attempt to conceal the true nature or origins of the victims.

9. Why avoid an open debate if the situation is so clear? The UK blocked Russia’s request for a UN session on Bucha, while reports show that Ukraine had rejected any Russian involvement in the investigation. So, why exclude one side?