Posted by barney on August 07, 1997 at 14:41:48:
In Reply to: Re: Ambassaden i Falkenberg posted by Lars Vilks on August 07, 1997 at 10:34:19:
: : Korrekt!
: : Det framgår också i artikeln i HN,
: : vilken naturligtvis kommer att
: : införas i sin helhet på Propaganda-
: : ministeriets hemsida inom kort.
: : (This matter is about a revoked building
: : permit for the Embassy in Falkenberg.
: : The discussion reffers to articles in
: : Swedish newspapers, soon published on
: : as english summaries on the Ministry
: : of Propaganda’s homepage...)
: : Lord Aslak Viking
: The problem with the building permit is probably
: of no importance. The community just has to
: renew it, if it is necessary... Another matter of
: extreme interest is that the Embassy in Falkenberg
: is owmed by the state secretary and he is not
: unwilling to sell it (and cheap). It would be a
: consolidation to have a new owner. The scenario
: would then grow out to a marvellous landscape.
: Can we find an new owner with some confidence?
Wait a moment!
Wouldn't it be an interesting development in the Nimis-Arx concept, to loose a law-suit because of a mistake made by the "other side", especially as this side is nominally positive to the embassy? Could this be described as eonatic law?
Post a Followup